2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.precamres.2021.106191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Redox fluctuation and δ13Corg-δ34S perturbations recorded in the 1.9 Ga Nuvilik Formation of the Cape Smith belt, Canada

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
3
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A typical example of such fluctuation is a transient elevation of the supply rate of Fe(II) caused by the eruption of large igneous provinces (LIPs) (Isley & Abbott, 1999; Rasmussen et al, 2012). This is consistent with the suggested LIP‐induced redox fluctuation at ~1.9 Ga based on C and S isotope signatures (Motomura et al, 2021). After the period of extensive IF deposition at ~1.9–1.8 Ga, the amount of IF became negligibly small (Figure 1b).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A typical example of such fluctuation is a transient elevation of the supply rate of Fe(II) caused by the eruption of large igneous provinces (LIPs) (Isley & Abbott, 1999; Rasmussen et al, 2012). This is consistent with the suggested LIP‐induced redox fluctuation at ~1.9 Ga based on C and S isotope signatures (Motomura et al, 2021). After the period of extensive IF deposition at ~1.9–1.8 Ga, the amount of IF became negligibly small (Figure 1b).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This might have worked (Isley & Abbott, 1999;Rasmussen et al, 2012). This is consistent with the suggested LIP-induced redox fluctuation at ~1.9 Ga based on C and S isotope signatures (Motomura et al, 2021). After the period of extensive IF deposition at ~1.9-1.8 Ga,theamountofIFbecamenegligiblysmall(Figure 1b).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…It is worth noting that many of the sedimentary samples reported in previous studies are in close proximity to the mafic-ultramafic complexes, so it is possible that their measured compositions have been affected by moderate extents of devolatilization which may lead to underestimated C and S concentrations of the assimilant in our models. For example, the distal and unmetamorphosed shale samples collected from the Nuvilik Formation at Raglan area are characterized as having higher C and lower S contents than that used in this study (Motomura et al, 2021). By inserting these shale compositions into the model, we found that a tiny fraction of assimilant (< 1%) is enough to cause Pt alloy saturation which is in consensus with the model results shown above.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Taking organic matter into account in the model would lead to more extreme estimates of the degree of reduction of the magma and strengthen our argument because oxidation of hydrocarbons containing C -4 (e.g., CH4) requires twice the net amount of reactant O to convert one mole of C to CO2. Although potential crustal rocks (i.e., assimilants) such as sediments from the Nuvilik Formation at Raglan (Motomura et al, 2021) or Noril'sk (Iacono-Marziano et al 2012a) have been suggested to have contained a significant amount of organic matter, native iron occurrences are rare. The absence of native iron may be attributed to the stability of graphite and undersaturation of native iron in mafic and ultramafic melt at relatively high pressures (>120 bar; Iacono-Marziano et al, 2012a), however, there is no evidence suggesting that extremely reducing conditions (e.g., ΔFMQ < -6) have been reached at any of the studied localities so we have chosen to take the conservative route of treating all C as graphite in all C-bearing sediments and lower crustal rocks assimilation modeling.…”
Section: Alphamelts Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The δ 34 S values of pyrite formed during early diagenesis are similar to those of SO 4 2– -reduced sulfides. Due to the Rayleigh fractionation effect, the δ 34 S values of pyrite formed in the late diagenesis stage will gradually increase. Therefore, the pyrite formation period was determined according to the difference in sulfur isotopes in different pyrite forms. Framboidal pyrite is generally considered to have formed during syn-sedimentary and early diagenetic stages, with a small grain size and negative sulfur isotopes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%