2015
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stv2227
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Redshift evolution of stellar mass versus gas fraction relation in 0 <z< 2 regime: observational constraint for galaxy formation models

Abstract: We investigate the redshift evolution of the molecular gas mass fraction (f mol = M mol M⋆+M mol , where M mol is molecular gas mass and M ⋆ is stellar mass) of galaxies in the redshift range of 0 < z < 2 as a function of the stellar mass by combining CO literature data. We observe a stellar-mass dependence of the f mol evolution where massive galaxies have largely depleted their molecular gas at z = 1, whereas the f mol value of less massive galaxies drastically decreases from z = 1. We compare the observed M… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 157 publications
(263 reference statements)
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our treatment of trends of FPZ parameters with z and M * as simple power laws is also highly over-simplified. As found by Lagos et al (2011Lagos et al ( , 2014; Morokuma-Matsui & Baba (2015), the redshift and M * dependence of gas-mass fractions is more complicated than this, as there are inflections and slight curvatures in the behavior of both quantities. Thus, our models are almost certainly not exact, but rather a simplified scaling aimed at a general representation of the trends necessary to explain the coevolution of SFR and metallicity.…”
Section: Redshift Variation Of the Stellar Mass Scalingmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Our treatment of trends of FPZ parameters with z and M * as simple power laws is also highly over-simplified. As found by Lagos et al (2011Lagos et al ( , 2014; Morokuma-Matsui & Baba (2015), the redshift and M * dependence of gas-mass fractions is more complicated than this, as there are inflections and slight curvatures in the behavior of both quantities. Thus, our models are almost certainly not exact, but rather a simplified scaling aimed at a general representation of the trends necessary to explain the coevolution of SFR and metallicity.…”
Section: Redshift Variation Of the Stellar Mass Scalingmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The tension in the comparison of the fraction of obscured star formation to dust-to-gas ratios as a function of stellar mass will only be amplified when accounting for the fact that gas fractions decrease with stellar mass at a given epoch (e.g. Narayanan et al 2015;Morokuma-Matsui & Baba 2015;Popping et al 2015;Scoville et al 2016;Saintonge et al 2011Saintonge et al , 2016Tacconi et al 2013Tacconi et al , 2017. Owing to the increased gas fraction of lower mass galaxies relative to more massive galaxies at a given redshift, the relation between dust mass to stellar mass will be shallower than that with dust-to-gas ratio.…”
Section: Metallicitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most surveys find that the mass in cold gas is highly dependent on the galaxies' stellar mass. For low-redshift galaxies (z < 0.5) the mass in HI (H2) ranges from 20 − 30% (8 − 10%) of the stellar mass for galaxies with M * = 10 10 M , dropping to 5 − 10% (4 − 5%) for galaxies with M * = 10 11 M (Saintonge et al 2011;Catinella et al 2013;Boselli et al 2014;Morokuma-Matsui & Baba 2015). Therefore, in order to estimate the mass of the cold gas component, we consider a cold gas fraction f cold which depends on the measured M * of our galaxies.…”
Section: Stars and Cold Gasmentioning
confidence: 99%