2016
DOI: 10.1111/trf.13579
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduced alloimmunization in mice following repeated transfusion with pathogen‐reduced platelets

Abstract: Pathogen reduction significantly reduces alloimmunization in repeatedly transfused mice and combined with leukoreduction provides a high level of protection from alloimmunization.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
36
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
4
36
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Antibodies were measured as previously described . Briefly, C57Bl/6J splenocytes (donor‐type target cells) were preincubated with an anti‐FcR blocking antibody, then incubated with the serum to be screened, and washed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Antibodies were measured as previously described . Briefly, C57Bl/6J splenocytes (donor‐type target cells) were preincubated with an anti‐FcR blocking antibody, then incubated with the serum to be screened, and washed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In efforts to improve transfusion safety, pathogen reduction technologies (PRT) are being implemented . In addition to inactivating bacteria, parasites and viruses, including CMV, PRT brings other benefits: replacement of gamma irradiation by white blood cell (WBC) inactivation, which eliminates the risk of transfusion‐transmitted GVHD; a lower frequency of febrile and allergic transfusion reactions and possibly a reduction in alloimmunization and preventing PLT refractoriness, which according to a recent publication still needs to be confirmed by evidence from clinical practice …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pathogen reduction technology (PRT) for blood components can provide significant benefits: 1) enhancing blood safety through the inactivation of viruses, bacteria, and parasites; 2) protecting the blood supply from emerging infectious agents for which laboratory tests might still be unavailable; 3) replacing gamma irradiation by inactivating white blood cells (WBCs) not removed by leukoreduction and thereby eliminating the risk of transfusion‐transmitted graft‐versus‐host disease; 4) preventing alloimmunization and avoiding platelet (PLT) refractoriness; 5) reducing the frequency of reactions related to PLT transfusions; and 6) in some settings improving blood supply logistics by increasing the PLT storage time . Thus, PRT that inactivates a broad range of pathogens provides an opportunity to substantially improve transfusion safety, not only by reducing bacterial contamination and sepsis but especially by preventing transfusion‐transmissible emerging infectious agents such as the Zika virus …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%