2018
DOI: 10.1002/mp.12864
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduced anatomical clutter in digital breast tomosynthesis with statistical iterative reconstruction

Abstract: Statistical image reconstruction enabled a significant reduction of both the through-plane artifacts level and anatomical clutter in the DBT reconstructions. The β value was found to be β≈2.14 with the SIR method. This value stays in the middle between the β≈1.8 for cone beam CT and β≈3.2 for mammography. In contrast, the measured β value in the clinical reconstructions (β≈3.17) remains close to that of mammography.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, artifacts in both planes could be well mitigated at the same time. For verification, we also tested the 2D convolution kernels which operated merely within the italicxy plane (i.e., slice‐wise regularization 4,10 ). Results indicate that the network performance was degraded, where the out‐of‐plane artifacts and the inconsistent intensity distributions along the z direction became much more dramatic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, artifacts in both planes could be well mitigated at the same time. For verification, we also tested the 2D convolution kernels which operated merely within the italicxy plane (i.e., slice‐wise regularization 4,10 ). Results indicate that the network performance was degraded, where the out‐of‐plane artifacts and the inconsistent intensity distributions along the z direction became much more dramatic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to the incompleteness of the projection data, the reconstructed DBT images may suffer severe in-plane and out-of-plane artifacts. [2][3][4] To reduce such image artifacts, various reconstruction strategies have been investigated. For example, the filtered backprojection (FBP) algorithm with modified ramp filter could be used to improve the mass detectability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(1). This implementation was inspired by the forward-backward splitting algorithm [26]- [28] with the modified proximal operator shown in Eq. 7.…”
Section: Proposed Esmart-recon: Algorithm and Numerical Implementamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optimal reconstruction parameters for ST-TV-SIR are μ spatial = 2 × 10 −5 , μ temporal = 1 × 10 −5 , λ = 0.1, s = 0.2, N Iter = 15, and N denoising = 100. The implementation of both PICCS and ST-TV-SIR was based on a generalization of the algorithm for total-variation-based statistical image reconstruction presented in[28]. Reconstruction parameters for SMART-RECON and eSMART-RECON were optimized in section IV-A1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%