2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduced availability of habitat structures in urban landscapes: Implications for policy and practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
64
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bat chainsaw hollows had a vertical slit entrance 2 × 15 cm (width × height); plunge cuts angled upwards at approximately 60 • were then used to create a wedge-shaped internal cavity (maximum depth = 25-30 cm) with a volume of approximately 500 cm 3 ( Figure 1c,d and Appendix A). This design was intended to simulate natural tree roosts used by bats that have 'vertical fissure' type entrances [76].…”
Section: Bat Cavitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Bat chainsaw hollows had a vertical slit entrance 2 × 15 cm (width × height); plunge cuts angled upwards at approximately 60 • were then used to create a wedge-shaped internal cavity (maximum depth = 25-30 cm) with a volume of approximately 500 cm 3 ( Figure 1c,d and Appendix A). This design was intended to simulate natural tree roosts used by bats that have 'vertical fissure' type entrances [76].…”
Section: Bat Cavitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dimensions of the boxes were 43 × 7.5 × 50 cm (width × depth × height), with an internal volume of 9555 cm 3 and an open-bottom entrance with a width of 1.5 cm (Figure 2). Bat boxes were installed on the same trees as the bat chainsaw hollows, positioned 15-20 cm below the entrance of each hollow, so that every box was paired with a chainsaw hollow on a trunk (14 boxes) or branch (21 boxes).…”
Section: Bat Cavitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This will eventually be beneficial in dealing with emerging social, ecological, environmental, and aesthetic challenges of this expanding urban growth [23]. Neighborhood development per se inevitably reduces the availability of habitat structures in urban landscapes which can jeopardize urban ecological sustainability [24]. However, with the planning and utility of design tools such as ecological design, spatial zoning, and community engagement, the destruction of habitat structures can be minimized and the balance between socio-economic priorities and biodiversity conservation may become achievable even at the site scale when those strategies can be practically implemented in those individual neighborhoods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%