2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneb.2007.12.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduced Availability of Sugar-sweetened Beverages and Diet Soda Has a Limited Impact on Beverage Consumption Patterns in Maine High School Youth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These policies ranged from removal of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) and junk food [2830]; change in canteen policies (increasing the availability of lower-fat foods in cafeteria’s à la carte areas and implementing school-wide, student-based promotions of these lower-fat foods) [31]; school self-assessment; nutrition education; nutrition policy (meet nutritional standards based on Dietary Guidelines for Americans); social marketing; and parent outreach [14]; fruit truck shops [32]; nutrition education and gardening program [33]; brisk walking lessons [22]; integration of health promotion in curriculum [27]; teacher trainings and development of activities related to food habits and/or physical activity [23]; fitness guidance, fitness and school nutrition, school-based nutrition, school and home nutrition and home-based nutrition [26]; modified school lunches, enhanced nutrition education and increased opportunities for physical activities [34]; comprehensive school health education, physical education and physical activity, school nutrition and food services, health promotion and wellness, school counselling, physical and behavioral health services, school climate, physical environment, youth, parent, family and community involvement [35]. Six out of seven studies assessing policy effectiveness in reduction of sugar intake reported desirable changes and reduction in sugar or SSBs consumption [21, 26, 28, 29, 35, 36]. These effective policies included elimination of SSB and other junk food in schools’ food policy, having a school food and nutrition policy in place, school district SSB policies, school nutrition and food services, nutrition-based standards and fitness guidance, fitness and school nutrition, school-based nutrition, school and home nutrition and home-based nutrition.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These policies ranged from removal of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) and junk food [2830]; change in canteen policies (increasing the availability of lower-fat foods in cafeteria’s à la carte areas and implementing school-wide, student-based promotions of these lower-fat foods) [31]; school self-assessment; nutrition education; nutrition policy (meet nutritional standards based on Dietary Guidelines for Americans); social marketing; and parent outreach [14]; fruit truck shops [32]; nutrition education and gardening program [33]; brisk walking lessons [22]; integration of health promotion in curriculum [27]; teacher trainings and development of activities related to food habits and/or physical activity [23]; fitness guidance, fitness and school nutrition, school-based nutrition, school and home nutrition and home-based nutrition [26]; modified school lunches, enhanced nutrition education and increased opportunities for physical activities [34]; comprehensive school health education, physical education and physical activity, school nutrition and food services, health promotion and wellness, school counselling, physical and behavioral health services, school climate, physical environment, youth, parent, family and community involvement [35]. Six out of seven studies assessing policy effectiveness in reduction of sugar intake reported desirable changes and reduction in sugar or SSBs consumption [21, 26, 28, 29, 35, 36]. These effective policies included elimination of SSB and other junk food in schools’ food policy, having a school food and nutrition policy in place, school district SSB policies, school nutrition and food services, nutrition-based standards and fitness guidance, fitness and school nutrition, school-based nutrition, school and home nutrition and home-based nutrition.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies similarly reported that schools were a relatively minor source of SSBs for adolescents 3 and that the association between in-school SSB availability and SSB consumption was modest. 38,50,51 In the contemporary “obesogenic” environment, youth have countless ways to obtain SSBs through convenience stores, fast-food restaurants, and other food outlets in their community.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, our results based on a single cross section indicate that state policies produce positive changes in school food environments, but any effect on student dietary consumption may be modest without complementary changes in other sectors, including the food environment in the community, as well as at-home consumption. 3,50,51,54 Experts have recommended broader policies, such as SSB taxes 55 or regulations of food marketing aimed at children. 56 Future research should explore the effect that school-based policies have on youth diet and weight gain when implemented in conjunction with policies in other sectors.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…38 One tactic has been to educate children on the energy and sugar contents of all beverages, 39 in addition to the typical nutrition education. Additionally, the parental characteristics, environment, and dietary component influences on SSB consumption patterns noted by others 22 , 40 may be considered in future research, particularly when engaging in public health approaches.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%