2022
DOI: 10.1121/10.0012696
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduced basis methods for numerical room acoustic simulations with parametrized boundaries

Abstract: The use of model-based numerical simulations of wave propagation in rooms for engineering applications requires that acoustic conditions for multiple parameters are evaluated iteratively, which is computationally expensive. We present a reduced basis method (RBM) to achieve a computational cost reduction relative to a traditional full-order model (FOM) for wave-based room acoustic simulations with parametrized boundaries. The FOM solver is based on the spectral-element method; however, other numerical methods … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Anti-aliasing techniques could be employed to reduce the error further (Engsig-Karup et al, 2016; Kirby and Karniadakis, 2003) or the use of cubature formulas to evaluate the inner products (Hesthaven and Warburton, 2008). However, in practical room acoustics simulations, error levels below 10 −7 are rarely needed, with the actual error requirements being around 5 × 10 −3 to 2 × 10 −2 (Sampedro Llopis et al (2022)), and, furthermore, such techniques increase the computational cost of the scheme.
Figure 5.Log–log plots showing the h convergence for the cylinder geometry using either affine or curvilinear meshes.
…”
Section: Numerical Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Anti-aliasing techniques could be employed to reduce the error further (Engsig-Karup et al, 2016; Kirby and Karniadakis, 2003) or the use of cubature formulas to evaluate the inner products (Hesthaven and Warburton, 2008). However, in practical room acoustics simulations, error levels below 10 −7 are rarely needed, with the actual error requirements being around 5 × 10 −3 to 2 × 10 −2 (Sampedro Llopis et al (2022)), and, furthermore, such techniques increase the computational cost of the scheme.
Figure 5.Log–log plots showing the h convergence for the cylinder geometry using either affine or curvilinear meshes.
…”
Section: Numerical Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High-order methods result in better accuracy-per-computational-cost and they have the potential to significantly reduce the runtime of simulations and are a must for having good accuracy in wave propagation problems over long integration times (Kreiss and Oliger, 1972). Recent development has also looked at utilizing higher-order methods along with reduced order modeling to reduce computational cost (Sampedro Llopis et al, 2022). The nodal DGFEM is particularly well suited for room acoustic simulations, because it combines the attractive features of geometric flexibility, high-order accuracy, suitability for parallel computing, and lean memory usage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sampedro Llopis et al [106] developed a method to explore the parameter space based on a reduced basis of a spectral element method formulated in the Laplace domain. Using Weeks' method [107] they computed room impulse responses, and found good agreement with time-domain solutions and full-order method solutions.…”
Section: Reduced Basismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Model order reduction techniques are also a promising avenue for more efficient room acoustics simulations, as demonstrated in Ref. [106]. Another area of possible exploration is the use of low-order elements with dispersion reduction techniques.…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%