Reduced cognitive control of response inhibition by the anterior cingulate cortex in autism spectrum disorders

Abstract

Response inhibition, or the suppression of prepotent, but contextually inappropriate behaviors, is essential to adaptive, flexible responding. In autism spectrum disorders (ASD), difficulty inhibiting prepotent behaviors may contribute to restricted, repetitive behavior (RRB). Individuals with ASD consistently show deficient response inhibition while performing antisaccades, which require one to inhibit the prepotent response of looking towards a suddenly appearing stimulus (i.e., a prosaccade), and to substitute a gaze in the opposite direction. Here, we used fMRI to identify the neural correlates of this deficit. We focused on two regions that are critical for saccadic inhibition: the frontal eye field (FEF), the key cortical region for generating volitional saccades, and the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC), which is thought to exert top-down control on FEF. We also compared ASD and control groups on the functional connectivity of the dACC and FEF during saccadic performance. In the context of an increased antisaccade error rate, ASD participants showed decreased functional connectivity of the FEF and dACC and decreased inhibition-related activation (based on the contrast of antisaccades and prosaccades) in both regions. Decreased dACC activation correlated with a higher error rate in both groups, consistent with a role in top-down control. Within the ASD group, increased FEF activation and dACC/FEF functional connectivity were associated with more severe RRB. These findings demonstrate functional abnormalities in a circuit critical for volitional ocular motor control in ASD that may contribute to deficient response inhibition and to RRB. More generally, our findings suggest reduced cognitive control over behavior by the dACC in ASD.Autism spectrum disorders (ASD) are common neurodevelopmental disorders that are characterized by restricted, repetitive behavior (RRB) and marked impairments in socialization and communication. These three symptom clusters are thought to arise from distinct genetic and cognitive mechanisms (Happe et al 2006;London 2007), but these mechanisms are not well-understood. Accumulating evidence suggests that executive function deficits contribute to these core symptoms of ASD (Hill 2004;Lopez et al 2005;South et al 2007). ResponseCorresponding author: Dara S. Manoach, 149 13th St., Room 2608, Charlestown, MA 02129; tel: 617 724 6148; fax: 617 726 4078; dara@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu. Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. NIH Public Access Author ManuscriptNeuroimage. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2011 August 1. Published ...

Resting-state functional connectivity predicts longitudinal change in autistic traits and adaptive functioning in autism

“…This network is thought to integrate bottom-up attention and top-down executive control to mediate interactions between other large-scale networks, such as the FPTCN and DMN, and to assign value to stimuli for later processing (45). The nodes of the SN have been implicated in disparate tasks ranging from social processing (46)(47)(48) to purely cognitive tasks (49). Intra-SN connections and SN-DMN connections were highly predictive of change in ABAS general adaptive composite (GAC) score (r 2 > 0.3)-a domain-general measure of adaptive behavior.…”

Neural Signatures of Autism Spectrum Disorders: Insights into Brain Network Dynamics

“…Primary nodes of the salience network are the anterior cingulate cortex and anterior insula, which neuroimaging studies suggest have a role in perception of social exclusion (Bolling et al, 2011;Masten et al, 2011) and cognitive control (Agam et al, 2010). A recent study ) compared connectivity in large-scale brain networks in children with ASD and matched controls.…”

Compensatory brain activation in children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder during a simplified Go/No-go task

“…During the past few years, a number of studies suggested that ADHD might be caused by a neurotransmitter system impairment (Nikolas et al 2010;Roman et al 2004) that explains a resulting loss of brain activation during RI. The dysfunction of some key neural circuits for RI could lead to apparent disinhibition of behaviors in the context of fast-changing environments (Agam et al 2010), which might provide a better understanding of RI deficits in ADHD. Neuroimaging studies which identified abnormalities in the key brain pathways of RI (Martin et al 2006;Mostofsky and Simmonds 2008) could extend our present knowledge of ADHD, and particularly functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has the unique power to reveal aberrant brain activity without hurting the human body (Smith et al 2006;Suskauer et al 2008;Tamm et al 2004;Vaidya et al 2005).…”