2011 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory Proceedings 2011
DOI: 10.1109/isit.2011.6034030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduced-complexity collaborative decoding of interleaved Reed-Solomon and Gabidulin codes

Abstract: An alternative method for collaborative decoding of interleaved Reed-Solomon codes as well as Gabidulin codes for the case of high interleaving degree is proposed. As an example of application, simulation results are presented for a concatenated coding scheme using polar codes as inner codes.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The bound (8) can also be used with random error values. For t ≤ L, rank(E) is then likely to equal t, in which case (8) reduces to (5); for t = n − k − 1 ≤ L, (8) (by (117)) yields the same bound as (6) with γ = 1, which agrees with the bounds in [17], [19], where different decoding algorithms are used.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…The bound (8) can also be used with random error values. For t ≤ L, rank(E) is then likely to equal t, in which case (8) reduces to (5); for t = n − k − 1 ≤ L, (8) (by (117)) yields the same bound as (6) with γ = 1, which agrees with the bounds in [17], [19], where different decoding algorithms are used.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Hence, when m ≥ d − 1, the decoding failure probability of the algorithm in Fig. 2 is bounded from above, up to a multiplicative factor 1 + o(1), by For m ≥ d − 1, this bound is (considerably) better than those given in [3] and [20], and is comparable to that in [29], [30] when m is much larger than d.…”
Section: Application To Probabilistic Decodingmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…In [3], Bleichenbacher et al identified a threshold, (m/(m+1))(d−1), on the number of block errors, below which the decoding failure probability approaches 0 as d goes to infinity and n/q goes to 0. A better bound on the decoding error probability was obtained by Kurzweil et al [20] and by Schmidt et al [29], [30]. See also Brown et al [5], Coppersmith and Sudan [6], Justesen et al [16], Krachkovsky and Lee [19], and Wachter-Zeh et al [34].…”
Section: B Related Workmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…When used together with an improved polar decoder, the beneficial effects of both approaches are combined. Furthermore, the proposed scheme can itself be used as an inner code in other concatenation approaches -at least if inner and outer decoding are performed separately there like in [6]. In this case, the coding gain in error performance is preserved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this end, we propose a modified polar code construction by means of a serial concatenated scheme with the polar code used as an inner code. In contrast to many existing concatenation schemes based on polar codes as inner codes (as considered, e.g., in [5], [6], [7]), we focus here on coding schemes that do not change overall rate and block length, thus facilitating a pure trade-off of complexity and error performance. The approach is based on our prior attempt [1] where block codes of small dimension were chosen as outer codes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%