2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuro.2008.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduced corpus callosum white matter microstructural integrity revealed by diffusion tensor eigenvalues in abstinent methamphetamine addicts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
33
2
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
6
33
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A few DTI studies on MA users reported WM changes in corpus callosum (Kim et al 2009;Salo et al 2009) and frontal lobe (Alicata et al 2009;Chung et al 2007;Tobias et al 2010), which were not found in the present study. The inconsistency could be caused by different demographic and drug use profiles.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A few DTI studies on MA users reported WM changes in corpus callosum (Kim et al 2009;Salo et al 2009) and frontal lobe (Alicata et al 2009;Chung et al 2007;Tobias et al 2010), which were not found in the present study. The inconsistency could be caused by different demographic and drug use profiles.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 89%
“…The inconsistency could be caused by different demographic and drug use profiles. Kim et al (2009) andTobias et al's (2010) studies included MA subjects who just abstained from MA for less than 1 month, whereas our subjects had abstained for 6 month even at baseline scan.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…DTI changes associated with METH abuse or dependence have commonly revealed lower FA in frontal white matter and increased MD in basal ganglia structures, such as the putamen and caudate (Alicata et al, 2009; Chung et al, 2007; Tobias et al, 2010). Differences in the integrity of the corpus callosum are less often found, with some investigators reporting lower FA values in the genu (Kim et al, 2009; Tobias et al, 2010), whereas others report only trends or no callosal effect (Alicata et al, 2009; Salo et al, 2009). When cognition is investigated, lower FA in regions within the frontal cortex or genu has been associated with worse cognitive performance (Chung et al, 2007; Salo et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%