2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.lithos.2012.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduced granitic magmas in an arc setting: The Catface porphyry Cu–Mo deposit of the Paleogene Cascade Arc

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Porphyry Mo and Sn-W deposits are associated with A-type and S-type granites, respectively, which form in back-arc continental environments (Christiansen and Keith, 1996;Newberry, 1998). Porphyry Cu-Mo and Cu-Au deposits are derived from I-type granites (Loucks, 2014;Dilles et al, 2014) that possess variable alkalinity (e.g., Barr et al, 1976;Lang et al, 1995), degrees of silica saturation (Seedorff et al, 2005), and oxidation states (Rowins, 2000;Smith et al, 2012;Cao et al, 2014). Porphyry deposits are rare in Proterozoic and Archean rocks, possibly due to differences in the style of plate tectonics and diminished preservation potential of older orogens (e.g., Groves et al, 2005;Richards and Mumin, 2014).…”
Section: Porphyry Depositsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Porphyry Mo and Sn-W deposits are associated with A-type and S-type granites, respectively, which form in back-arc continental environments (Christiansen and Keith, 1996;Newberry, 1998). Porphyry Cu-Mo and Cu-Au deposits are derived from I-type granites (Loucks, 2014;Dilles et al, 2014) that possess variable alkalinity (e.g., Barr et al, 1976;Lang et al, 1995), degrees of silica saturation (Seedorff et al, 2005), and oxidation states (Rowins, 2000;Smith et al, 2012;Cao et al, 2014). Porphyry deposits are rare in Proterozoic and Archean rocks, possibly due to differences in the style of plate tectonics and diminished preservation potential of older orogens (e.g., Groves et al, 2005;Richards and Mumin, 2014).…”
Section: Porphyry Depositsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data of the CAOB and Pacific Rim metallogenic belt are from Lee (); Smith et al . (); Shen and Pan (); Shen et al . (2015); Xiao et al .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…An elevated oxygen fugacity will facilitate the extraction of Cu into the melts at the source because melts have a much higher solubility of metal and sulfur due to S as SO42 under oxidizing conditions (Carroll & Rutherford, ). However, there are several porphyry Cu (Mo‐Au) systems associated with low oxygen fugacity (≤QFM buffer) granitic rocks (Rowins, ), such as the Catface porphyry Cu‐Mo‐Au deposit (Smith et al, ), the Pulang porphyry Cu deposit (Liu et al, ), and the Baogutu porphyry Cu deposit (Cao et al, ). Therefore, other factors (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, comparison of the distribution of trace elements may reveal factors that control the trace element distribution in different Cu-(Fe)-sulfides, particularly for reduced porphyry Cu deposit. Previous studies have indicated that the Cu-(Fe)sulfides in reduced porphyry Cu deposits, which include chalcopyrite, bornite, and chalcocite, are similar to those in classic porphyry Cu deposits [5,[16][17][18][19]. However, owing to the limited number of the reduced porphyry Cu deposits, fewer studies have been conducted on sulfides in this type of deposit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%