2005
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1705075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduced-intensity allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for acute leukemias: ‘what is the best recipe?’

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
(97 reference statements)
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regimens have been classified according to the degree of myelosuppression and immunosuppression that they induce. 6 These differences have been shown to influence the kinetics of engraftment and response. [7][8][9][10][11] The combination of fludarabine phosphate with melphalan (Flu/Mel) in RIC regimens is a moderately intensive regimen.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regimens have been classified according to the degree of myelosuppression and immunosuppression that they induce. 6 These differences have been shown to influence the kinetics of engraftment and response. [7][8][9][10][11] The combination of fludarabine phosphate with melphalan (Flu/Mel) in RIC regimens is a moderately intensive regimen.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing therapies for leukemia rely on chemotherapy composed of steroids, anthracyclines and nucleoside analogs, and/or stem cell transplantations. [1][2][3] Despite a relatively high cure rate (upwards of 85%), long-term sequelae are often seen in patients and include cardiac complications and an increased risk of second malignancies. 4,5 Therefore, a major challenge in leukemia research is to develop new therapies to decrease toxicity, maintain remission, and prolong survival of patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Since the late 1990s, several other non-myeloablative regimens have been developed, using PBSC as source of stem cells. 5 This choice is explained by the high level of CD34 + cells and T lymphocytes in PBSC grafts, which allows a better engraftment than BM grafts. [8][9][10][11][12] However, PBSC has also been shown to increase the risk of chronic GVHD (cGVHD) compared with BM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5] Traditionally, the goal of the preparative regimen has been eradication of the malignancy as well as providing sufficient immunosuppression and creating marrow space to prevent graft rejection. This belief has been questioned to reduce the toxicity of the conditioning and generate more graft-versus-malignancies effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%