1995
DOI: 10.1097/00007890-199502270-00011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduced Inter- And Intrasubject Variability in Cyclosporine Pharmacokinetics in Renal Transplant Recipients Treated With a Microemulsion Formulation in Conjunction With Fasting, Low-Fat Meals, or High-Fat Meals1,2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
67
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
67
2
Order By: Relevance
“…DWC.AUC[0-4] and DWC.AUC [0][1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] approximately doubled in value during the first 3 months post-transplant, but whether this change was continuous throughout this period or reached a threshold value at a specific time is impossible to determine in view of the absence of measures between day 14 and day 84. However, data from a prior international multicenter study in de novo renal transplantation during which kinetics were evaluated from 2 weeks to 3 months post-transplant suggests that absorption may stabilize between 1 and 2 months after commencing therapy (31).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…DWC.AUC[0-4] and DWC.AUC [0][1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] approximately doubled in value during the first 3 months post-transplant, but whether this change was continuous throughout this period or reached a threshold value at a specific time is impossible to determine in view of the absence of measures between day 14 and day 84. However, data from a prior international multicenter study in de novo renal transplantation during which kinetics were evaluated from 2 weeks to 3 months post-transplant suggests that absorption may stabilize between 1 and 2 months after commencing therapy (31).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 4-point predictor C0 π C1 π C2 π C3 performed well (mean R 2 Ω 0.84), but was not superior to several 2-and 3-point predictors. Subsequent analysis including all time-points throughout the dosing interval showed that later time points were more important in predicting AUC [0][1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. While C3 remained the best single-point predictor (mean R 2 Ω 0.72), C1.5 π C6 provided the best 2-point performance (mean R 2 Ω 0.88), and multipoint predictors including sample times at Cmax (C1-C2.5) and at intervals throughout the elimination phase (C3-C12) offered the best overall correlation (not shown).…”
Section: Prediction Of Absorption Profilementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations