Evidence has suggested that women have greater emotional reactivity than men. However, it is unclear whether these differences in basic emotional responses are also associated with differences in emotional distractibility, and what the neural mechanisms that implement differences in emotional distractibility between women and men are. Functional MRI recording was used in conjunction with a working memory (WM) task, with emotional distraction (angry faces) presented during the interval between the memoranda and the probes. First, we found an increased impact of emotional distraction among women in trials associated with high-confidence responses, in the context of overall similar WM performance in women and men. Second, women showed increased sensitivity to emotional distraction in brain areas associated with "hot" emotional processing, whereas men showed increased sensitivity in areas associated with "cold" executive processing, in the context of overall similar patterns of response to emotional distraction in women and men. Third, a sex-related dorsalventral hemispheric dissociation emerged in the lateral PFC related to coping with emotional distraction, with women showing a positive correlation with WM performance in left ventral PFC, and men showing similar effects in the right dorsal PFC. In addition to extending to men results that have previously been reported in women, by showing that both sexes engage mechanisms that are similar overall in response to emotional distraction, the present study identifies sex differences in both the response to and coping with emotional distraction. These results have implications for understanding sex differences in the susceptibility to affective disorders, in which basic emotional responses, emotional distractibility, and coping abilities are altered.
Keywords Emotional interference . Social anxiety . Amygdala . Subgenual anterior cingulate cortex (sgACC) . Dorsolateral/ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC/vlPFC) . Fusiform face area (FFA)Probably due to their enhanced relevance for survival, emotional stimuli tend to capture our attention more easily than do neutral ones, and thus they can be powerful distractors, particularly if they are task-irrelevant. Because people vary in their responses to and ability to cope with emotional distraction, goal-irrelevant emotions may impact them differently. The present study focused on sex differences in the response to emotional distraction. Although the available anecdotal and scientific evidence suggests that women and men may respond differently to emotional situations, it is still unclear whether differences in emotional reactivity are also associated with differences in emotional distractibility, and whether men and women engage similar or dissociable mechanisms in their responses to emotional distraction. Previous studies involving dual-task paradigms with emotional distraction that have allowed for clear dissociations of the time courses of response in the ventral-affective and dorsal-cognitive brain systems hav...