1975
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1975.149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduced lethality in mice receiving a combined dose of cyclophosphamide and busulphan

Abstract: Summary.-Animals treated with a sufficiently high dose of busulphan die about 14 days later from bone marrow failure. A single, appropriately timed injection of cyclophosphamide can save these mice. The nature of this protection is shown to be the cyclophosphamide induced elaboration of a humoral factor which stimulates haemopoietic recovery.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

1978
1978
1990
1990

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mortality due to bone marrow failure after treatment with melphalan and busulphan may be reduced by priming at 2 days with melphalan or cyclophosphamide respectively (Jeney et al, 1968). This protection is due to enhanced recovery of the bone marrow (Millar et al, 1975). After irradiation, similar protection of the marrow, assessed by the spleen CFU-S, is optimal with a slightly longer priming interval of 3 days with Cy, and 1 day after priming with cytosine arabinoside (Blackett, personal communication).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mortality due to bone marrow failure after treatment with melphalan and busulphan may be reduced by priming at 2 days with melphalan or cyclophosphamide respectively (Jeney et al, 1968). This protection is due to enhanced recovery of the bone marrow (Millar et al, 1975). After irradiation, similar protection of the marrow, assessed by the spleen CFU-S, is optimal with a slightly longer priming interval of 3 days with Cy, and 1 day after priming with cytosine arabinoside (Blackett, personal communication).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Priming with Cy has been shown to reduce lethality in mice after total-body irradiation, by enhancing haemopoietic recovery (Gregory et al, 1971;Millar & Hudspith, 1976;Blackett & Aguado, 1979). Cy priming acts by a similar mechanism to protect against busulphan toxicity (Millar et al, 1975). Cy priming has also been shown to increase mouse survival after a second large dose of Cy, but neither the cause of death nor the mechanism of protection could be explained (Millar & McElwain, 1978).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data were generated from survival curves for MY-CFUc and GM-CFUC following melphalan treatment made on the same bone marrow aspirates from each patient. Myeloma cells were designated resistant to melphalan if the ratio of the doses of melphalan required to reduce the surviving fraction to 10% between MY-CFU, and GM-CFU, was 4 or greater (Millar et al, 1989 Since all patients receive cyclophosphamide (400 mg m-2) 7 days before HDM to enhance the recovery of normal bone marrow progenitors (Millar et al, 1975) (Bonnet et al, 1982;Kyle et al, 1982). Also, patients in CR have measurable disease using anti-idiotypic antibodies to detect the residual myeloma clone (Stevenson & Thompson, 1988) despite the restoration of normal haemopoiesis and absence of detectable paraprotein.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept that scheduling cytotoxic drugs in specific sequences may enhance the recovery of normal tissue has been established for more than a decade (Millar et al, 1975;Millar & McElwain, 1978). In animal models this phenomenon has not been accompanied by sparing of tumour tissue (Evans et al, 1983 Since both plasmacytoid and lymphoplasmacytoid myeloma cells formed MY-CFU, in vitro from patients at first and second relapse, we cannot claim to predict the future response at second relapse of these patients to chemotherapy based on the emergence of lymphoplasmacytoid cells.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These combinations generally take the form of a small dose (the pretreatment or priming dose) followed by a large challenge dose of the same (Jeney et al, 1968;Rose et al, 1975;Millar and McElwain, 1978) or different cytotoxic agent Jeney et al, 1968;Schmidt et al, 1970: Millar et al, 1975Millar and Hudspith 1976;Millar et al, 1978).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%