2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2011.09.056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduced order models for describing dispersion and reaction in monoliths

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the study by series expansion and through illustration in Chatwin (1970), the longitudinal normality of the mean concentration has been well established at a time scale of 1.0R 2 /D, as verified by other studies (Houseworth 1984;Stokes & Barton 1990;Phillips & Kaye 1996). A generalized dispersion model was presented in Gill (1967), Gill & Sankaras (1970), Gill & Sankarasubramanian (1971), and strides towards a certain exact averaging model were made recently by applying the Lyapunov-Schmidt technique of bifurcation theory (Ratnakar & Balakotaiah 2011;Ratnakar, Bhattacharya & Balakotaiah 2012). Asymptotic analyses for the dispersion (Phillips & Kaye 1996, 1997 and numerical simulations of the transport process (Houseworth 1984;Stokes & Barton 1990;Shankar & Lenhoff 1991) have also been carried out.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In the study by series expansion and through illustration in Chatwin (1970), the longitudinal normality of the mean concentration has been well established at a time scale of 1.0R 2 /D, as verified by other studies (Houseworth 1984;Stokes & Barton 1990;Phillips & Kaye 1996). A generalized dispersion model was presented in Gill (1967), Gill & Sankaras (1970), Gill & Sankarasubramanian (1971), and strides towards a certain exact averaging model were made recently by applying the Lyapunov-Schmidt technique of bifurcation theory (Ratnakar & Balakotaiah 2011;Ratnakar, Bhattacharya & Balakotaiah 2012). Asymptotic analyses for the dispersion (Phillips & Kaye 1996, 1997 and numerical simulations of the transport process (Houseworth 1984;Stokes & Barton 1990;Shankar & Lenhoff 1991) have also been carried out.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Regarding the accuracy (and validity) of the present model with respect to simpler or more complex models, the following comments (which are substantiated in references [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]) are appropriate: (i) The simplest of the models, namely the one dimensional pseudo-homogeneous plug flow model is structurally unstable and does not show ignition/extinction but only parametric sensitivity (ii) The pseudo-homogeneous model with no axial gradients (which is included as a special case of our model when interphase gradients are negligible) is robust but is good only for very small axial length scales and hydraulic diameters (micro-channels) [Remark: Structural stability or robustness here implies that the bifurcation and/or qualitative features do not change when the model is perturbed by including spatial gradients or other phenomena as long as the perturbations are small, see [30]] (iii) The 2-D boundary layer models (of parabolic type) that ignore axial diffusion (conduction) are structurally unstable, index infinity differential-algebraic system (and are not initial value problems). Further, as explained in the literature articles [23,26], most computational codes do not consider the Gibbs' phenomenon (which does not disappear even for arbitrarily small mesh size and leads to incorrect fluxes and temperature overshoot at the point of ignition) and compute only a single solution.…”
Section: Model Developmentmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, when the velocity profile is fully developed before entering the reactive section (e.g. fully developed laminar flow in a channel where a part of the fore section is not coated or reactive), three modes (simple spatial average, where homogeneous rate is evaluated, mixing-cup average, which is the experimentally measured value and the value at the wall, where the catalytic rate is evaluated) are necessary to describe the local (transverse) gradients [25,29]. We do not consider this more general three-mode lumped model in this work.…”
Section: Model Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(6) as follows: (10) Note that the ratio of volumes of oil-phase to gas-cap (␣) is already known. The Henry's constant can also be measured independently by other methods.…”
Section: Estimation Of Henry's Constantmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molecular diffusion is one of the core transport phenomenon in various disciplines of science and engineering, including chemical engineering [1][2][3][4] , polymer science [5] , Biology [6][7] , combustion technology [8] , automobile industries [9][10][11] , petroleum engineering (tertiary recovery in CO2 flooding [12][13][14][15][16] ; Vapex [17][18] ; solution gas drive process [19] ; drilling fluid [20] ; acid fracturing [21][22] ) and many more. In Petroleum engineering applications, the molecular diffusion plays a very important role in various reservoir processes; especially in the oil recovery processes where convective forces are not dominant or when direct frontal contact and mixing is not possible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%