2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2011.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduced-order multiple tuned mass damper optimization: A bounded real lemma for descriptor systems approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a personal computer with an Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-7200U CPU @ 2.50 GHz-2.71 GHz, for every walking, running and jumping excitation simulation case, it only takes about 30 s. From Figure 15, it can be seen that, on the one hand, the model analysis result fits well with the in situ test; on the other hand, the maximum response of the in situ test is 74.5 gal. According to References [38][39][40] and also the requirements of the client, as for the walking excitation, the structural acceleration response limit value is 15 gal and 50 gal for running and jumping excitations. The structural acceleration response of the A2 point under walking and running excitations are shown in Figure 16.…”
Section: The Frequency Identification Results Comparison Between the Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a personal computer with an Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-7200U CPU @ 2.50 GHz-2.71 GHz, for every walking, running and jumping excitation simulation case, it only takes about 30 s. From Figure 15, it can be seen that, on the one hand, the model analysis result fits well with the in situ test; on the other hand, the maximum response of the in situ test is 74.5 gal. According to References [38][39][40] and also the requirements of the client, as for the walking excitation, the structural acceleration response limit value is 15 gal and 50 gal for running and jumping excitations. The structural acceleration response of the A2 point under walking and running excitations are shown in Figure 16.…”
Section: The Frequency Identification Results Comparison Between the Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Daniel et al [39] proposed the multimode control of footbridges using MTMDs. Jokic et al [40] presented a reduced-order optimization of MTMDs. Roman and Justyna [41] carried a dynamic analysis of structures with MTMDs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an attempt to remedy this limitation of TMD, more than one TMD with different dynamic characteristics have been proposed and investigated by, for example, the references. [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] Furthermore, the semiactive TMD is also seen to be a promising solution to the detuning problem of TMD, because of the unique feature that the semiactive TMD in real time updates the stiffness or damping of TMD based on the sensed data on the actual vibration state of the structure (e.g., Nagarajaiah and Varadarajan, [35] Nagarajaiah and Sonmez, [36] Nagarajaiah, [37] Lin et al, [38] and Weber et al [39] ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aiming to ensure and enhance the performance, namely, the broadband effectiveness of the TMD in seismic scenarios, one of the feasible alternatives is to employ the multiple tuned mass dampers (MTMD) with distributed natural frequencies, which have been investigated by, for example, Jangid, Li, Li and Liu, Casciati and Giuliano, Lin et al, Han and Li, Fu and Johnson, Jokic et al, Daniel et al, Mohebbi et al, Fadel Miguel et al, and Bozer and Özsarıyıldız . Meanwhile, the semiactive tuned mass damper is seen to be a promising solution to the detuning problem of the TMD due to the unique feature that it in real‐time updates the stiffness or damping of the TMD based on the sensed data on the actual vibration state of a structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%