2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.08.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduced Precision of the Pentacam HR in Eyes with Mild to Moderate Keratoconus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
18
2
Order By: Relevance
“…If differences greater than our limits are seen, this is suggestive that real change has occurred. Epstein and Hashemi, respectively, reported 95% reproducibility limits for Kmax of 1.51 and 2.3 D 12 13. These are greater than our limits for early disease but less than our limits for advanced disease, and our study shows that it is essential to consider the stage of disease when assessing whether a change between scans is real or due to observer variation.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If differences greater than our limits are seen, this is suggestive that real change has occurred. Epstein and Hashemi, respectively, reported 95% reproducibility limits for Kmax of 1.51 and 2.3 D 12 13. These are greater than our limits for early disease but less than our limits for advanced disease, and our study shows that it is essential to consider the stage of disease when assessing whether a change between scans is real or due to observer variation.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…Results from these studies suggest that repeatability and reproducibility of keratometry measurements appear to be lower in keratoconus12 13 patients than in normal eyes,14 15 but there has been inconsistency in the results in the few studies to date on interobserver and intraobserver agreement on Pentacam measures of corneal shape in keratoconus 12 13. Important clinical decisions are being made on the basis of changes in these measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), this finding could not be verified for patients with keratoconus in whom a higher variability of Kmax parameters was observed (Hashemi et al. ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Similarly, Hashemi et al . 22 reported a significant improvement in inter-observer agreement for Kmax using the mean of three repeated measurements in patients with KC. We have shown a consistent improvement of LOA across all parameters and devices by a factor of approximately , as expected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…3 SD) LOA was considered as the cut-off value for the progression in keratoconic eyes. The required sample size was estimated based on a reproducibility within-subject SD of 0.83 for Kmax in patients with mild to moderate KC, which corresponds to a SD of 1.17 D (0.83/) for the difference of two measurements 22 . For the mean of 3 measurements, the SD of the difference of two means is expected to reduce to 0.68 D (1.17/).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%