2012 International Symposium on Wireless Communication Systems (ISWCS) 2012
DOI: 10.1109/iswcs.2012.6328366
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduced rank spatial filter for interference cancellation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [3], the weights , have an impulse response length equal to that of the propagation channels, while impulse response length is twice more long. The optimal solution according to the proposed algorithm is the one obtained when the rank of is equal to the sum lengths of , , impulse response's.…”
Section: Ill-conditioned Matrix Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [3], the weights , have an impulse response length equal to that of the propagation channels, while impulse response length is twice more long. The optimal solution according to the proposed algorithm is the one obtained when the rank of is equal to the sum lengths of , , impulse response's.…”
Section: Ill-conditioned Matrix Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper presents the implementation results on the fixedpoint DSP chip (TMS 320C6474) [1] of an interference cancellation algorithm based on 2 antennas SIMO system [3]. This implementation is made in the fixed-point 16-bit resolution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The originality of the presented algorithm for cochannel interference cancellation is based on the exploitation of the length of the channel impulse response [1]. The assumption of low rank channel allows the introduction of an extra third weight applied to the reference signal at the receive antennas, see figure 1.…”
Section: Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Performing interference cancellation algorithm [1], while neglecting the estimation of the length of the channel impulse response means that the performance of the algorithm becomes sub-optimal even when this length of the channel impulse response is assumed much larger than the true one. This problem appears essentially in the matrix inversion included in the algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%