2019
DOI: 10.1111/cpf.12597
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduced regional strain rate is the most accurate dysfunction in predicting culprit lesions in patients with acute coronary syndrome

Abstract: Background and Aim Predicting culprit lesions in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) could be a challenge. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of regional wall motion abnormalities (RWMA) using various echocardiographic techniques and ECG changes in predicting the culprit coronary lesion in a group of patients with ACS. Methods In 80 consecutive patients with ACS (age 55Á7 AE 9Á4 years, 77% male, 15% with CCS Angina III), an echocardiographic examination of left ventricle (LV) RWMA, tissue Doppler imagi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(39 reference statements)
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“… 28 In a study of 80 consecutive ACS patients by Shenouda et al, the mean regional systolic strain rate accurately predicted the culprit lesion. 29 Although in our study, the diagnostic accuracy was low [AUC 0.645 (CI 0.496 to 0.777); P = 0.07], the systolic strain rate was significantly different between group A and group B and correlated significantly with the syntax score.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 65%
“… 28 In a study of 80 consecutive ACS patients by Shenouda et al, the mean regional systolic strain rate accurately predicted the culprit lesion. 29 Although in our study, the diagnostic accuracy was low [AUC 0.645 (CI 0.496 to 0.777); P = 0.07], the systolic strain rate was significantly different between group A and group B and correlated significantly with the syntax score.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 65%
“…Data interpretation: Although the wall motion score index is currently used as the conventional echocardiographic parameter for diagnosing ischemic dysfunction [25] and for diagnosing significant coronary artery stenosis (>70%) according to guidelines [26], it proved less accurate in the subset of patients we studied compared to myocardial deformation measurements. All our patients had symptoms suggestive of ischemia, probably stable angina, but we used stress echocardiography on them in order to identify the most accurate echocardiographic parameter for predicting the culprit lesion and whether they are the same as we previously found in patients with acute coronary syndrome (STEMI and NSTEMI) [27,28]. This objective was also strengthened by the underlying ischemic myocardial disease our patients had, as manifested by a reduced resting LV EF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…SR has potential advantages over strain. It is less influenced by the loading conditions, has a better ability to identify the culprit lesion during acute coronary syndrome (15) and better predicts prolonged hospital stay after aortic valve replacement (16). However, major limitations still preclude its widespread use in clinical practice.…”
Section: Heart Failurementioning
confidence: 99%