2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.05.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduced sensitivity to slow-rate dynamic auditory information in children with dyslexia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
84
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
(69 reference statements)
9
84
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with several studies (Chandrasekaran et al, 2009;Ziegler et al, 2009;Poelmans et al, 2011), dyslexics' performance was comparable to controls' when the stimuli were presented in quiet, but was significantly worse than that of age-matched controls in all noisy backgrounds. This deficit held true for the three consonant features examined here, which tempers previous finding of a specific impairment of reception of voicing and/or place of articulation in noise in dyslexic individuals (Hazan et al, 2013;Ziegler et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consistent with several studies (Chandrasekaran et al, 2009;Ziegler et al, 2009;Poelmans et al, 2011), dyslexics' performance was comparable to controls' when the stimuli were presented in quiet, but was significantly worse than that of age-matched controls in all noisy backgrounds. This deficit held true for the three consonant features examined here, which tempers previous finding of a specific impairment of reception of voicing and/or place of articulation in noise in dyslexic individuals (Hazan et al, 2013;Ziegler et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Interestingly, dyslexics' deficit was even observed when compared to younger, reading age-matched control children, suggesting that their speech perception deficit was not related to a mere delay in reading acquisition, but constituted a core difficulty inherent to dyslexia. Later studies replicated this finding using either vowel (Poelmans et al, 2011) or sentence (Chandrasekaran et al, 2009) identification tasks presented in a SSN background. However, Dole et al (2012) showed that dyslexic adults exhibited preserved perception of speech under SSN, but were impaired when presented with babble noise.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Independent work in Dutch has found similar results (Poelmans et al 2011), although a negative result was reported in Greek (Georgiou et al 2010). Brain imaging (EEG) studies suggest that the brains of children with dyslexia respond differently to slower rise times (90 ms but not 15 ms; see Stefanics et al 2011).…”
Section: Discrimination Of Amplitude Modulation and Rise Time In Dyslmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Poelmans et al, investigated sensitivity to frequency modulation, amplitude rise-time, speech in noise perception, and PA in children with dyslexia. They disclosed less sensitive to slow-rate dynamic auditory processing, speech in noise perception, PA, and literacy abilities in children with dyslexia than controls 23 . In other study of the same authors, carried-out in adults with dyslexia, researchers found deviant phonemic rate responses of the Auditory steady state responses 24 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 82%