2015 10th European Microwave Integrated Circuits Conference (EuMIC) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/eumic.2015.7345059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduced-size E-band GaAs power amplifier MMIC

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…21, with lower passive loss compared to a conventional Wilkinson combiner. In the range 60-75 GHz, reported GaAs PAs support [130], and saturated power higher than 28 dBm and 26 dB power gain from 71 to 76 GHz [131]. T-line power combiners are extensively used in these high power PAs.…”
Section: V-band (40-75 Ghz)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21, with lower passive loss compared to a conventional Wilkinson combiner. In the range 60-75 GHz, reported GaAs PAs support [130], and saturated power higher than 28 dBm and 26 dB power gain from 71 to 76 GHz [131]. T-line power combiners are extensively used in these high power PAs.…”
Section: V-band (40-75 Ghz)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An E-band PA in the same core process, with similar, small, device widths, maximum backvias, and the same dc power density of 1 W/mm was estimated to have 137 ∘ C gate temperature averaged to spot diameter of 8 μm with a backplate of 85 ∘ C [20]. This amplifier is expected to heat similarly.…”
Section: Amplifier Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…challenging task. Most designers need general purpose models, that must be computationally efficient and at same time must work over a wide frequency range, under different biases and for very different operating conditions, as class C, where the device exhibits a strongly nonlinear behavior, or class A, where operates almost linearly [3], [6]. However, it is not possible for a general-purpose model to obtain excellent predictions in "all" operating conditions (i.e., operating frequency, bias condition, power level, impedance terminations at fundamental, and harmonics), maintaining adequate computational efficiency.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The factors that impact on model accuracy at millimeter waves mainly arise from two sources: the first one is related to the availability of measurements to be used for accurate parameter extraction; the second one is related to the adopted model formulation, that under very different operations must guarantee adequate overall accuracy and computational efficiency [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11]. This aspect is particularly critical when the technology process is pushed into its limits as happens in the design of broadband highly linear Eband PAs, which are the most critical components in 5G backhauling, where high-order modulations [1024 quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM)] over large bandwidths (2 GHz) are required [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. This specific application demands a level of accuracy and reliability under linear and quasilinear operation (i.e., up to 1-dB power gain compression) that the foundry models usually do not provide: this ultimately leads to multiple foundry runs with consequent waste of time and money.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%