2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2005.10.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reduced specificity of autobiographical memories following a negative mood induction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
48
3
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
48
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the sub-group of participants who still showed elevated blood pressure levels at the end of the memory task compared to baseline, the association between cortisol increase and the number of specific recent neutral autobiographical memory retrieval was indeed stronger and significant. Furthermore, mood was not affected by the stressor, which might be another reason why we did not find group effects, as could be expected on the basis of the functional avoidance mechanism of the CaR-FAX model (see Williams et al, 2007) and earlier findings of mood inductions on autobiographical memory retrieval (Au Yeung et al, 2006;Svaldi & Mackinger, 2003). However, effects of stress on declarative memory without decreases in mood have been reported before (Domes, Heinrichs, Rimmele, Reichwald, & Hautzinger, 2004;Tollenaar et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the sub-group of participants who still showed elevated blood pressure levels at the end of the memory task compared to baseline, the association between cortisol increase and the number of specific recent neutral autobiographical memory retrieval was indeed stronger and significant. Furthermore, mood was not affected by the stressor, which might be another reason why we did not find group effects, as could be expected on the basis of the functional avoidance mechanism of the CaR-FAX model (see Williams et al, 2007) and earlier findings of mood inductions on autobiographical memory retrieval (Au Yeung et al, 2006;Svaldi & Mackinger, 2003). However, effects of stress on declarative memory without decreases in mood have been reported before (Domes, Heinrichs, Rimmele, Reichwald, & Hautzinger, 2004;Tollenaar et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Second, decreased specificity might be a result of functional avoidance. Because stress may induce negative mood states (e.g., Kuhlmann et al, 2005b), stressed individuals might try to avoid further mood disturbances by avoidance of sensory and perceptual details of negative events and hence adopt an over-general retrieval style (see Au Yeung, Schartau, 2006, andSvaldi &Mackinger, 2003, for the negative effects of mood inductions on memory specificity). Third, rumination about self-referential attributes can also lead to lowered specificity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following music was used for each of the mood induction conditions: 1) Positive: the Mazurka from 'Coppelia' by Delibes, 2) Negative: a half--speed version of 'Russia under the Mongolian yoke' by Prokofiev and 3) Neutral: the Largo movement from 'The New World Symphony' by Dvorak. These pieces of music have been shown in previous studies to reliably induce the intended affective state (Mayer et al, 1995;Yeung, Dalgleish, Golden, & Schartau, 2006).…”
Section: Mood Induction Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of recent studies have started to indicate that OGM can be induced in healthy volunteers (Yeung et al, 2006) and reduced in depressed individuals (NeshatDoost et al, 2013). Yeung et al (2006) investigated whether reduced autobiographical memory specificity (AMS) could be induced in healthy volunteers with no history of depression, using a negative mood manipulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yeung et al (2006) investigated whether reduced autobiographical memory specificity (AMS) could be induced in healthy volunteers with no history of depression, using a negative mood manipulation. Results showed a reduction in AMS following negative mood induction, compared to a neutral induction, whereas positive mood induction had no effect on AMS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%