2021
DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2020.20030343
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reducing Adolescent Psychopathology in Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Children With a Preschool Intervention: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Across all transition types, very few interventions included in the review were delivered solely post-transition (n = 4; 17%) and there is no clear trend that interventions that run across the transition were more effective than those that were solely pre-transition. There is no clear pattern of effectiveness based on whether interventions were targeted at low SES families or not, although some of the larger interventions, in particular REDI-C and REDI-P (Bierman et al, 2014(Bierman et al, , 2015(Bierman et al, , 2017(Bierman et al, , 2019(Bierman et al, , 2021a(Bierman et al, , 2021bNix et al, 2013;Welsh et al, 2020), did demonstrate effectiveness across the preschool to school transition for this population. In terms of bias assessment, the larger more extensive interventions also tended to be those more likely to receive a 'some concerns' rather than 'high' assessment, and there does appear to be a trend that these better quality interventions are more likely to report positive effect estimates.…”
Section: Transition To Post-compulsory Educationmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Across all transition types, very few interventions included in the review were delivered solely post-transition (n = 4; 17%) and there is no clear trend that interventions that run across the transition were more effective than those that were solely pre-transition. There is no clear pattern of effectiveness based on whether interventions were targeted at low SES families or not, although some of the larger interventions, in particular REDI-C and REDI-P (Bierman et al, 2014(Bierman et al, , 2015(Bierman et al, , 2017(Bierman et al, , 2019(Bierman et al, , 2021a(Bierman et al, , 2021bNix et al, 2013;Welsh et al, 2020), did demonstrate effectiveness across the preschool to school transition for this population. In terms of bias assessment, the larger more extensive interventions also tended to be those more likely to receive a 'some concerns' rather than 'high' assessment, and there does appear to be a trend that these better quality interventions are more likely to report positive effect estimates.…”
Section: Transition To Post-compulsory Educationmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…REDI added a daily interactive reading program that uses books linked to the PATHS lessons designed to support oral language skill development, along with a Sound Games program to promote phonological awareness and alphabet center activities to build print awareness. A randomized controlled trial of REDI in Head Start classrooms produced positive effects on teaching quality and child outcomes in both social-emotional and language-literacy domains (Bierman et al, 2008) with sustained child benefits through ninth grade (Bierman et al, 2021). Adaptations to REDI were made to accommodate the lesscentralized structure of childcare centers and facilitate program scalability.…”
Section: Scaling School Readiness: Predicting Implementation Of Redi ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five years post-intervention, latent-class growth analysis showed enduring intervention benefits on academic outcomes and children who began behind their peers in EF at the study outset particularly benefited from PATHS in terms of increased EF skills over time (Sasser et al, 2017). A follow up of the REDI cohort, by Bierman et al (2020), 8-10 years post-intervention (children aged 12-13 and 14-15, respectively) indicated enduring benefits for intervention children, relative to control children in reduced conduct and emotional problems, as well as fewer intervention children evidencing clinically significant problems, namely fewer problems with peers, emotions, and conduct as measured by the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). Taken together, the U.S. evidence base on preschool PATHS indicates the intervention has shown an ability to not only protect children in the general population (i.e., universal prevention) but can also be beneficial in protecting higher risk groups of children, for example children exposed to poverty and/or adverse childhood experiences (e.g., better than expected reductions in socialemotional distress and increased school bonding see Gamze et al, 2019;Sanders et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%