POINT
How often misused tests generate misleading thoughts:an argument for the appropriate use of the urinalysis to rule out urinary tract infections.-Adapted from Herbert Spencer O ptimum use of laboratory testing requires that providers order tests only for patients with an appropriate indication; urine cultures are no exception to this rule. Guidelines published by the Infectious Diseases Society of American support urine testing and sterilization in the absence of symptoms for only two groups: pregnant women and those about to undergo urologic surgery (1). For the remainder of patients, such testing should be done only in the context of symptoms consistent with a urinary tract infection (UTI): fever, urgency, frequency, dysuria, suprapubic tenderness, altered mental status, or hypotension. And yet, up to half of patients for whom a urine test is ordered in the emergency department (ED) or general medicine services (2) do not have symptoms consistent with a UTI. Unfortunately, several studies have demonstrated that these test results, and not the patient's symptoms, drive antibiotic utilization (2-4). Such overuse of testing is problematic on several fronts, including potential misdiagnosis (i.e., early case closing and failure to evaluate for other causes of symptoms by the physician), overuse of antimicrobials and their associated risks, and a high burden of testing for the laboratory. A rapid diagnostic strategy to diagnose UTI is therefore desirable but does not exist at present. However, UA (performed either with a dipstick or an automated instrument) is thought by many to be a useful screen by which to rule out UTI in a symptomatic patient. I will demonstrate that the detection of pyuria or bacteria by UA is a screening test that, when used appropriately, is associated with a high negative predictive value (NPV) that should impart confidence to the physician that a urine culture will not yield additional, clinically relevant information (i.e., the culture will be negative), and that a UTI is unlikely to be the cause of their patient's symptoms. However, it should be emphasized that the appropriate use of UA to rule out UTI is in the context of a patient with symptoms consistent with a UTI.The absence of pyuria upon UA is an excellent predictor of a negative urine culture. One of the challenges associated with implementing a UA reflex-to-culture algorithm is the absence of evidence-based guidance on which UA parameters best predict urine culture results. Several studies have evaluated the predictive values of both indirect markers of infection: a positive result for nitrite (a marker for the presence of Enterobacteriaceae in the urine) or leukocyte esterase (LE; a marker for the presence of leukocytes) or direct observation of white blood cells (i.e., pyuria) or bacteria in the urine by microscopy. When evaluated in a population with a low prevalence of positive bacterial cultures, such as outpatients suspected of having a UTI, the NPV of any of these factors individually is excellent. For instance, a la...