2012
DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2012.145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reducing bias in bacterial community analysis of lower respiratory infections

Abstract: High-throughput pyrosequencing and quantitative PCR (Q-PCR) analysis offer greatly improved accuracy and depth of characterisation of lower respiratory infections. However, such approaches suffer from an inability to distinguish between DNA derived from viable and non-viable bacteria. This discrimination represents an important step in characterising microbial communities, particularly in contexts with poor clearance of material or high antimicrobial stress, as non-viable bacteria and extracellular DNA can con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
99
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
7
99
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The approach that has been used for deep-sequencing in most human microbiomic studies does not differentiate DNA derived from live versus dead bacteria. Although the exclusion of DNA from nonviable bacterial cells with the use of reagents such as propidium monoazide has been proposed (32)(33)(34), there is no clear consensus among Human Microbiome Project investigators as to the best approach to deal with this issue. There are reasonable concerns that essentially any step in DNA processing presents an opportunity for introducing bias (e.g., propidium reagents do not interact with all cell types in the same way).…”
Section: Original Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approach that has been used for deep-sequencing in most human microbiomic studies does not differentiate DNA derived from live versus dead bacteria. Although the exclusion of DNA from nonviable bacterial cells with the use of reagents such as propidium monoazide has been proposed (32)(33)(34), there is no clear consensus among Human Microbiome Project investigators as to the best approach to deal with this issue. There are reasonable concerns that essentially any step in DNA processing presents an opportunity for introducing bias (e.g., propidium reagents do not interact with all cell types in the same way).…”
Section: Original Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such analyses have typically revealed much greater bacterial diversity than is reported through standard diagnostic microbiology (7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12), with a substantial contribution often made by species requiring anaerobic conditions for growth, including members of the genera Prevotella, Veillonella, Propionibacterium, and Actinomyces (8,13).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The predominant bacterial species identified were Ralstonia pickettii and P. acnes (Figure 2b and Tables E2 and E3). These two organisms, both identified as common in prior CF microbiota studies (3,(29)(30)(31), were not detected in any of the cultures. Taxa of the genus Anaerococcus, which, like Propionibacterium, includes anaerobes commonly found in CF sputum (31), were also detected in each section.…”
Section: Pathologic and Microbiological Analysismentioning
confidence: 71%