1994
DOI: 10.1093/nar/22.21.4545
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reducing bias in cDNA sequence representation by molecular selection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, we reduced the complexity of the transcriptome by cDNA normalization prior to sequencing. cDNA normalization lead to a significant increase in transcriptome sequencing efficiency by equalizing the representation of high, medium and rarely expressed transcripts in the cDNA population [ 50 - 52 ]. Since many transcripts are temporally and/or spatially expressed during plant development, RNA pooled from different tissues at different developmental stages ensured the coverage of temporal- and spatial-specific transcripts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, we reduced the complexity of the transcriptome by cDNA normalization prior to sequencing. cDNA normalization lead to a significant increase in transcriptome sequencing efficiency by equalizing the representation of high, medium and rarely expressed transcripts in the cDNA population [ 50 - 52 ]. Since many transcripts are temporally and/or spatially expressed during plant development, RNA pooled from different tissues at different developmental stages ensured the coverage of temporal- and spatial-specific transcripts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the hybridization cycle, the cDNA population is divided into two fractions: ds cDNA containing the majority of the initial cDNA (except for very rare genes), and single-stranded (ss) cDNA comprising initial transcripts at largely comparable concentrations. This ss cDNA fraction is then isolated using a technique such as selective amplification, hydroxyapatite columns, magnetic beads, or enzymatic hydrolysis of ds cDNA (Coche and Dewez, 1994;Soares et al, 1994;Luk'ianov et al, 1996;Carninci et al, 2000;Zhulidov et al, 2004), and used for the construction of a normalized cDNA library.…”
Section: Commentarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(4) Cloning of the normalized cDNA library [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. The main differences between the available normalization methods consist in the procedure of separation of the normalized ss cDNA fraction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main differences between the available normalization methods consist in the procedure of separation of the normalized ss cDNA fraction. The separation is accomplished using several approaches, such as the physical separation of ss-and ds-fractions by the chromatography on hydroxylapatite [2,3,8] or by means of paramagnetic beads [7,11], the cleavage of the ds-fraction by restriction endonucleases [5], and the amplification of the ssfraction using the PCR suppression effect [10]. Unfortunately, most of the available approaches are unsuitable for the normalization of cDNA samples enriched with full-length sequences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%