2013
DOI: 10.1007/s12053-013-9193-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reducing health impacts of biomass burning for cooking—the need for cookstove performance testing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Scaling-up the use of improved cookstoves is a central component of this effort. Improved cookstoves are cookstoves that are able to meet the household’s cooking needs, are durable and affordable, are acceptable to the household, consume less fuel than traditional stoves or a three-stone fire, and reduce household air pollution to levels that will improve health [ 17 , 18 ]. These stoves are more efficient than traditional and unimproved stoves because they require less fuel for cooking, less time for gathering fuel, and less time for cooking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scaling-up the use of improved cookstoves is a central component of this effort. Improved cookstoves are cookstoves that are able to meet the household’s cooking needs, are durable and affordable, are acceptable to the household, consume less fuel than traditional stoves or a three-stone fire, and reduce household air pollution to levels that will improve health [ 17 , 18 ]. These stoves are more efficient than traditional and unimproved stoves because they require less fuel for cooking, less time for gathering fuel, and less time for cooking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fuel consumption can be driven by myriad factors (e.g., geography, climate, and cooking practices), making it highly difficult to develop an adequate one-size-fits-all estimation approach [39]. Emission factors calculated from water boiling tests do not always reflect household emissions from daily cooking activities [40,41]. Johnson et al [42] found that under daily-use conditions, improved Patsari stoves developed for use in rural Mexico performed significantly worse relative to open fires in WBT tests than they had in simulated kitchens-but they also performed significantly better in daily use when making tortillas-a far more common activity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estimates published by de Miranda Carneiro et al (2013), based on the use of a spatiallyexplicit land use model to examine the availability of fuelwood, suggest default values for f NRB of wood-fuel on the order of 20-30%, much lower than the prior estimates. Bailis et al (2015) estimate that 27-34% of woodfuel harvested was unsustainable, with large geographic variations, and conclude that cookstove methodologies probably overstate the climate benefits.…”
Section: Baseline Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The primary advantage of the Water Boiling Test is its simplicity and reduced costs; the laboratory-based method is standardized and replicable. However, the laboratory results on stove performance do not necessarily translate to cooking actual meals in households, and thus the accuracy of this method is frequently called into question (Abeliotis & Pakula 2013;Johnson et al 2007). Meanwhile, the Controlled Cooking Test protocol provides a compromise, better representing local cooking while being conducted in a controlled environment.…”
Section: Baseline Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 99%