“…Compared with the blended amine, biphasic amine, and ionic liquid that exhibit higher reaction kinetics while also higher volatility, corrosivity, and viscosity, the enhanced desorption rates by SACs enable a reduction of CO 2 desorption temperature and allow the conventional regeneration process to operate at temperatures below 100 °C, which could minimize evaporation energy consumption and prevent MEA degradation. , However, the effectiveness of such SACs is limited by their poor specific surface area, pore structure, and durability under treatment with aqueous amine solutions. , The three-dimensional hydrophobic surface with small micropore size distribution of the SACs restricts the diffusion of polar reactants (RNHCOO – , RNH 3 + , and H 3 O + ) in their to approach active sites . The active protonated sites of BASs are prone to leach in an alkaline environment, and the metal species of LASs will rapidly aggregate with −NH 2 groups and be removed from activity, thus leading to the deactivation of the SACs . Therefore, although amine regeneration using these SACs can increase the energy efficiency, the inaccessibility and deactivation of the active sites must be suppressed to further promote energy-efficient amine regeneration processes.…”