2012
DOI: 10.1186/cc11043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reducing ICU blood draws with artificial intelligence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 16-bed; n = 229 PD N/S Education (prices information via emails); A&F (number of tests ordered via emails) Pre-I: 10 mo Per-I: 3 mo Post-I: 9 days 39% reduction in inappropriate tests for critical patients; no statistical significance for semi-critical patients N/S N/S Cahill et al [ 41 ] 2018 Retrospective BAA (C.A.) N/S N/S Education (iatrogenic anemia focus culture); Guidance (locally established) Pre-I: 11 mo Post-I: 11 mo 23% reduction in laboratory orders; 21% reduction in blood specimens; 23% reduction in POCT specimens N/S No increase in LOS nor transfusion need Castellanos et al [ 84 ] 2018 Prospective ITS 25-bed PCT CPOE (clinical decision support system implementation) Pre-I: 4 mo Per-I: 4 consecutives periods of 28 days (ON1-OFF1-ON2-OFF2) Post-I: 28 days 0.807 TPD on Pre-I (= baseline), 0.662 (−18%) on ON1, 0.733 (−10%/baseline) on OFF1, 0.803 (−0.4%/baseline) on ON2, 0.792 (−2%/baseline) on OFF2, 0.807 (+ 0%/baseline) in Post-I EUR 15000 (/y) if persistence of scenario “ON1” N/S Cismondi et al [ 98 ] 2012 Database MIMIC-II database version 2.6; n = 40,426 patients HCT, HB, PLT, CA, LACT, aPTT, INR/PT, FIB AI (TS fuzzy modeling; inputs: heart rate, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, temperature, arterial blood pressure, urine output, intravenous infusions volumes and packed red blood cells, fresh frozen plasma, and platelets transfusions) N/A Reduction in 50% of total amount of tests; 11.5% false negatives (= tests that would not be done following algorithm but were in fact appropriate) N/S N/A ...…”
Section: Interventions To Improve Laboratory Testing Appropriateness ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… 16-bed; n = 229 PD N/S Education (prices information via emails); A&F (number of tests ordered via emails) Pre-I: 10 mo Per-I: 3 mo Post-I: 9 days 39% reduction in inappropriate tests for critical patients; no statistical significance for semi-critical patients N/S N/S Cahill et al [ 41 ] 2018 Retrospective BAA (C.A.) N/S N/S Education (iatrogenic anemia focus culture); Guidance (locally established) Pre-I: 11 mo Post-I: 11 mo 23% reduction in laboratory orders; 21% reduction in blood specimens; 23% reduction in POCT specimens N/S No increase in LOS nor transfusion need Castellanos et al [ 84 ] 2018 Prospective ITS 25-bed PCT CPOE (clinical decision support system implementation) Pre-I: 4 mo Per-I: 4 consecutives periods of 28 days (ON1-OFF1-ON2-OFF2) Post-I: 28 days 0.807 TPD on Pre-I (= baseline), 0.662 (−18%) on ON1, 0.733 (−10%/baseline) on OFF1, 0.803 (−0.4%/baseline) on ON2, 0.792 (−2%/baseline) on OFF2, 0.807 (+ 0%/baseline) in Post-I EUR 15000 (/y) if persistence of scenario “ON1” N/S Cismondi et al [ 98 ] 2012 Database MIMIC-II database version 2.6; n = 40,426 patients HCT, HB, PLT, CA, LACT, aPTT, INR/PT, FIB AI (TS fuzzy modeling; inputs: heart rate, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, temperature, arterial blood pressure, urine output, intravenous infusions volumes and packed red blood cells, fresh frozen plasma, and platelets transfusions) N/A Reduction in 50% of total amount of tests; 11.5% false negatives (= tests that would not be done following algorithm but were in fact appropriate) N/S N/A ...…”
Section: Interventions To Improve Laboratory Testing Appropriateness ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cismondi et al . [ 97 , 98 ] applied fuzzy systems algorithms on patients hospitalized in the ICU for gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding with an input of 11 physiological variables (such as heart rate, temperature, oxygen saturation, urine output, etc . ).…”
Section: Interventions To Improve Laboratory Testing Appropriateness ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous work on multivariate time series classification functions under the assumption that the signals are aligned and collected at the same time steps, with missing values being imputed through simple methods such as mean-fitting and interpolation [Kreindler and Lumsden, 2016] or more complex procedures such as Expectation Maximization (EM) [García-Laencina et al, 2010], multiple imputation [Galimard et al, 2016], resampling [Cismondi et al, 2013] and kernel methods [Rehfeld et al, 2011]. These methods are usually easy to implement and can yield good results when datasets have few missing values, but perform poorly when the dataset is too sparse [Che et al, 2018].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ongoing examples of our current investigations include the following: prediction of which patients with hypotension will respond to fluid resuscitation and which ones will proceed to develop multiorgan failure; Markov modeling to determine the proper duration for a trial of aggressive ICU care among high-risk patients (21); and fuzzy modeling to predict whether gastrointestinal bleeding will stop with conservative treatment alone or requires an endoscopic or surgical intervention. Artificial intelligence methods have also been used with the MIMIC database to predict whether a laboratory test is significantly changed from the last determination by modeling the treatments and the physiologic response during the interim period among patients who presented with gastrointestinal bleeding (22). The goal is to reduce unnecessary testing, which contributes to patient discomfort, use of staff time, iatrogenic anemia, increased laboratory costs, and medical errors that result from false-positive results.…”
Section: Creating Data-driven Tools Predictive Modeling Prognosticatmentioning
confidence: 99%