2022
DOI: 10.1109/tbme.2021.3135154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reducing Line-of-Block Artifacts in Cardiac Activation Maps Estimated Using ECG Imaging: A Comparison of Source Models and Estimation Methods

Abstract: published version features the final layout of the paper including the volume, issue and page numbers. Link to publication General rightsCopyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights.• Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ECGI has been formulated in terms of various equivalent cardiac source models, including single/multiple equivalent dipoles or equivalent double-layer (EDL) representation (Zhou et al, 2019;Svehlikova et al, 2022), activation isochrones (Erem et al, 2014b;Potyagaylo et al, 2019b), transmural or heart surface transmembrane potentials (Wang et al, 2011;Rahimi et al, 2016;Schuler et al, 2022), and extracellular potentials on the closed epicardial ("Epi") or combined epicardial/endocardial ('EpiEndo') heart surface (Bear et al, 2019;Erenler and Serinagaoglu Dogrusoz, 2019;Onak et al, 2022;Schuler et al, 2022). In this study, we compare two well-established cardiac source models for PVC localization: a single equivalent dipole-based source model and the model in terms of extracellular potentials defined on the heart surface (Epi and EpiEndo), which is a monopole-based source model coupled with BEM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…ECGI has been formulated in terms of various equivalent cardiac source models, including single/multiple equivalent dipoles or equivalent double-layer (EDL) representation (Zhou et al, 2019;Svehlikova et al, 2022), activation isochrones (Erem et al, 2014b;Potyagaylo et al, 2019b), transmural or heart surface transmembrane potentials (Wang et al, 2011;Rahimi et al, 2016;Schuler et al, 2022), and extracellular potentials on the closed epicardial ("Epi") or combined epicardial/endocardial ('EpiEndo') heart surface (Bear et al, 2019;Erenler and Serinagaoglu Dogrusoz, 2019;Onak et al, 2022;Schuler et al, 2022). In this study, we compare two well-established cardiac source models for PVC localization: a single equivalent dipole-based source model and the model in terms of extracellular potentials defined on the heart surface (Epi and EpiEndo), which is a monopole-based source model coupled with BEM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, PVC localization from the potential-based approach requires finding the activation times (AT) and determining the earliest activated location. These post-processing steps could introduce artifacts in the reconstructed activation isochrones, as demonstrated in Schuler et al (2022), which could cause errors in the PVC location estimates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ATs were derived from ECGI and sock EGMs as the time of the minimum dV/dt. For ECGI, the ATs were then spatially smoothed by combining them with an estimate of the local spatial gradient ( Cluitmans et al., 2022 ), a method well known to increase the accuracy of the reconstructed ATs over the traditional temporal-only method that are more prone to lines of false conduction block and poor estimates for ectopic localization ( Cluitmans et al., 2017 ; Duchateau et al., 2019 ; Schuler et al., 2021 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Excitation propagation simulations (Fig. 1D) were performed with an anisotropic eikonal model as used in [54],…”
Section: Excitation Propagation Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%