2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2015.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reducing nonpayment for public utilities: Experimental evidence from South Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
14
1
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
14
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the pattern of action and backsliding is also reminiscent of a series of studies that document this outcome in response to home energy reports (Allcott and Rogers, 2014), flood insurance (Gallagher, 2014), electricity and running water bills (Gilbert and Zivin, 2013;Szabo and Ujhelyi, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Furthermore, the pattern of action and backsliding is also reminiscent of a series of studies that document this outcome in response to home energy reports (Allcott and Rogers, 2014), flood insurance (Gallagher, 2014), electricity and running water bills (Gilbert and Zivin, 2013;Szabo and Ujhelyi, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In response, the utility considered two strategies to improve revenue collection: (i) an engagement approach to encourage payment; and (ii) service contract enforcement that allowed for disconnection for nonpayment. 3 Both approaches are commonly used by utilities around the world to improve revenue collection efficiency, but limited evidence exists on their costs and benefits (Hernandez and Laird, 2019;Szabó and Ujhelyi, 2015). In this paper we report on the results of a field experiment designed to test both strategies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most households have predominantly been subjected to postpaid billing, and just lately, there has been a significant shift toward the prepaid metering system [2]. This shift is due to the fact that with a postpaid metering system, users are billed, and monthly payments are based on overall usage, which means that service takes precedence over payment [1], [3], [4]; prepaid metering, on the other hand, requires the user to purchase tokens and units before electricity usage [5]. Electricity was first provided in Nigeria through a postpaid metering system, this requires DISCO staff to manually interpret meter readings and consumers pay for the electricity that has already been used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%