2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103188
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reducing postural load in order picking through a smart workwear system using real-time vibrotactile feedback

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
33
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A substantially reduced proportion of accumulated time was observed among the participants when provided solely with verbal ‘ergonomic’ instructions (24–41%) and reduced further when provided with haptic feedback training in combination with verbal ‘ergonomic’ instructions (36–65%). This reduction in accumulated time in upper-arm elevation related to the haptic feedback is larger than has been observed previously, where reductions in accumulated time in upper-arm elevation angles of 4–32% were observed [ 69 ]. These differences might reflect the proportional postural load attributed to the individual work technique, hence the potential that can be targeted by using the haptic feedback training for work technique improvements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…A substantially reduced proportion of accumulated time was observed among the participants when provided solely with verbal ‘ergonomic’ instructions (24–41%) and reduced further when provided with haptic feedback training in combination with verbal ‘ergonomic’ instructions (36–65%). This reduction in accumulated time in upper-arm elevation related to the haptic feedback is larger than has been observed previously, where reductions in accumulated time in upper-arm elevation angles of 4–32% were observed [ 69 ]. These differences might reflect the proportional postural load attributed to the individual work technique, hence the potential that can be targeted by using the haptic feedback training for work technique improvements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Additionally, the total feedback training period in the current study and in Lind et al [ 69 ] was less than 15 min, so the effect on reduced productivity is limited and should rather be compared with the time needed when using other training programs. Interestingly, no significant difference was observed in the accumulated time of upper-arm elevation when comparing the first and second haptic feedback sessions ( Figure 9 a), or when comparing the first and second verbal instruction sessions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 3 more Smart Citations