Reducing Potentially Avoidable Complications in Patients with Chronic Diseases: The Prometheus Payment Approach

Abstract

Objective (or Study Question). To determine whether a new payment model can reduce current incidence of potentially avoidable complications (PACs) in patients with a chronic illness. Data Sources/Study Setting. A claims database of 3.5 million commercially insured members under age 65. Study Design. We analyzed the database using the Prometheus Payment model's analytical software for six chronic conditions to quantify total costs, proportion spent on PACs, and their variability across the United States. We conducted a literature review to determine the feasibility of reducing PACs. We estimated the financial impact on a prototypical practice if that practice received payments based on the Prometheus Payment model. Principal Findings. We find that (1) PACs consume an average of 28.6 percent of costs for the six chronic conditions studied and vary significantly; (2) reducing PACs to the second decile level would save U.S.$116.7 million in this population; (3) current literature suggests that practices in certain settings could decrease PACs; and (4) using the Prometheus model could create a large potential incentive for a prototypical practice to reduce PACs. Conclusions. By extrapolating these findings we conclude that costs might be reduced through payment reform efforts. A full extrapolation of these results, while speculative, suggests that total costs associated to the six chronic conditions studied could decrease by 3.8 percent.

Continuity and the Costs of Care for Chronic Disease

“…For this sample of beneficiaries, we identified episodes of care for each of the three chronic conditions, with each episode triggered by a physician professional service for one of a set of predefined ICD-9 diagnosis codes at any point during 2008. 13 Using this approach we identified 98,850 CHF episodes, 147,708 COPD episodes, and 281,584 DM episodes (Appendix Table 1). Because our measurement window was limited to two years, each person could have only a single episode for each condition; however, a single patient with comorbities could have up to three episodes (one for each condition).…”

“…For each clinical condition, complications were defined based on Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Clinical Classification Software. 13 Three clinicians independently reviewed and rated the extent to which each complication was likely to be sensitive to care continuity for each clinical condition (see Appendix Table 3 for ratings and details). Complications that were rated as potentially sensitive to continuity and were observed in at least 1% of patients were included in our analyses.…”

The PROMETHEUS Bundled Payment Experiment: Slow Start Shows Problems In Implementing New Payment Models

“…11 Progress Of The Pilots As of May 2011, none of the pilot sites had achieved the goal of using PROMETHEUS as a payment method or had executed bundled payment contracts between payers and providers. The participants expressed disappointment at the slow progress, which for some lagged months or years behind their planned milestones.…”

The Moreton Lecture: Choices Faced by Radiology in the Era of Accountable Health Care

“…For diabetes, as an example, all costs (hospital charges, physician fees, pharmaceutical expenses, etc) related to an inpatient stay for which the primary reason for the admission was "diabetes out of control" would be classified as potentially avoidable complications. Findings varied by condition, but overall, these employers found that 28.6% of their costs were due to potentially avoidable complications [1]. Under most payment models, doctors, hospitals, and other providers are being paid for treating those complications, even if they might have caused the complications in the first place.…”