2004
DOI: 10.1258/1356262041591131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reducing risk in the IVF laboratory: implementation of a double witnessing system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though the occurrence of mix-ups is rare, several cases have been reported in fertility clinics around the world (Spriggs, 2003;Bender, 2006). Currently applied measures, such as the labeling of all labware together with the implementation of manual double witnessing (Brison et al, 2004;Magli et al, 2008) or electronic witnessing protocols (Schnauffer et al, 2005;Glew et al, 2006), undoubtedly minimize the risk of sample mismatching due to human error. However, as gametes/embryos are moved from one container to another several times during the course of an ART cycle, the possibility of misidentification still exists.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though the occurrence of mix-ups is rare, several cases have been reported in fertility clinics around the world (Spriggs, 2003;Bender, 2006). Currently applied measures, such as the labeling of all labware together with the implementation of manual double witnessing (Brison et al, 2004;Magli et al, 2008) or electronic witnessing protocols (Schnauffer et al, 2005;Glew et al, 2006), undoubtedly minimize the risk of sample mismatching due to human error. However, as gametes/embryos are moved from one container to another several times during the course of an ART cycle, the possibility of misidentification still exists.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If a second checker is involved, he or she needs to check patient details independently of the first checker. A robust checking system is a prerequisite in many other areas of our health care systems, such as medication administration 20 and in vitro fertilization checks, 23 not just transfusion practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sophisticated electronic methods for tracking gametes and embryos are now available from other industries (e.g. RFid (radio frequency identification) tags) and may be required to increase patient confidence, and provide quality assurance, without the significant pitfalls of double witnessing (Brison et al 2004c). The challenge is to implement these advanced technologies while ensuring they are safe.…”
Section: The Challenge Of the New Embryo Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%