2018
DOI: 10.3390/su10092968
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reducing Risks in Energy Innovation Projects: Complexity Theory Perspective

Abstract: The aim of this paper is to contribute to existing work on project risk management, and energy innovation projects, using the lens of complexity theory. By regarding energy innovation projects as complex adaptive systems, and linking complexity theory elements to the possibilities for reducing risks of energy innovation projects, the authors conducted empirical research on a representative sample of 100 subjects. The authors used a questionnaire that was formed on the basis of a previously designed research mo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As discussed previously, the energy, economic and political landscapes in South Africa are faced with many risks and uncertainties. In addition, sustainable energy projects or energy innovation projects are characterised by many risks [43], such as numerous risks from the environment, which are hard to predict, multidisciplinary project teams and multiple stakeholders, difficult decision making and financial risk. In order to plan for a sustainable energy future at a local government level, these risks and uncertainties need to be considered, but according to Bowers and Khorakian [44], approaches to deal with these risks have not been explicitly examined.…”
Section: Risk Assessment Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As discussed previously, the energy, economic and political landscapes in South Africa are faced with many risks and uncertainties. In addition, sustainable energy projects or energy innovation projects are characterised by many risks [43], such as numerous risks from the environment, which are hard to predict, multidisciplinary project teams and multiple stakeholders, difficult decision making and financial risk. In order to plan for a sustainable energy future at a local government level, these risks and uncertainties need to be considered, but according to Bowers and Khorakian [44], approaches to deal with these risks have not been explicitly examined.…”
Section: Risk Assessment Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, many has been done in researching different types of sustainability [38] and infrastructure projects challenges such as planning [18,39,40], procurement and contracting [41,42], ex post evaluation [43,44], strategic governance [45], public sector capacities [19], risk management [46,47,48], etc. All of these researches had great successes in addressing different connected questions and areas.…”
Section: Sustainable Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the terminology of experiment planning, input variables and structural assumptions that make up the simulation model are named factors, and the output performance is called responses. To run experiments with the simulation model fora commercial bank's project portfolio, four main factors are identified: budget of the project portfolio; duration of the project portfolio; number and composition of personnel engaged in a banking project; ratio of diverse types of banking projects in the portfolio [3], [17].…”
Section: Planning Experiments With the Simulation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%