2013
DOI: 10.15760/trec.66
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reducing Seismic Risk to Highway Mobility: Assessment and Design Examples for Pile Foundations Affected by Lateral Spreading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
(99 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ASCE/COPRI 61 (2014) assumes independent effects of these loads for port facilities, although it recommends evaluating this assumption on a project-specific basis. Caltrans (2012) and ODOT (Ashford et al 2012) recommend combining 100% lateral spreading with 50% inertia. WSDOT (2015), on the other hand, recommends 100% lateral spreading with 25% inertia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ASCE/COPRI 61 (2014) assumes independent effects of these loads for port facilities, although it recommends evaluating this assumption on a project-specific basis. Caltrans (2012) and ODOT (Ashford et al 2012) recommend combining 100% lateral spreading with 50% inertia. WSDOT (2015), on the other hand, recommends 100% lateral spreading with 25% inertia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method is mostly used for flexible laterally loaded piles and is based on a beam on nonlinear wrinkler foundation, hence pile and soil modelling. Ashford et al, (2013) stated that this method uses a series of nonlinear soil springs to represent a relationship between soil resistance, p, and relative deflection, y. The method relies on a series of p-y curves which depend on data from lateral pile load tests (Zhang, 2009).…”
Section: A) the Subgrade Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%