2003
DOI: 10.1002/job.199
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reducing subjectivity in the assessment of the job environment: development of the Factual Autonomy Scale (FAS)

Abstract: Self-report measures of job stressors have been criticized for being too subjective, rendering relations with other variables inconclusive. The Factual Autonomy Scale (FAS) was developed to reduce subjectivity by careful choice of fact-based items. Results of two studies showed that when compared to the Job Diagnostic Survey autonomy scale, the FAS demonstrated superior convergent validity with alternate sources (supervisors in Study 1 and coworkers in Study 2), and discriminant validity when correlated with t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
74
0
6

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(54 reference statements)
3
74
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…First, studies should investigate discrepancy in relation to more objective health outcomes such as biomarkers or physician-diagnosed disease or even death. Future studies of the work environment may also benefit from self-report questions that are less influenced by individual perceptions (26) and utilize novel methods for incorporating multiple sources of observation (27) that ensures an accurate capture of the actual circumstances of the structured working conditions. It may also be useful to consider how discrepancy between types of measures depends on categories of interaction between demand and control aspects of the work environment (eg, individuals in "passive" jobs) (1,5).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, studies should investigate discrepancy in relation to more objective health outcomes such as biomarkers or physician-diagnosed disease or even death. Future studies of the work environment may also benefit from self-report questions that are less influenced by individual perceptions (26) and utilize novel methods for incorporating multiple sources of observation (27) that ensures an accurate capture of the actual circumstances of the structured working conditions. It may also be useful to consider how discrepancy between types of measures depends on categories of interaction between demand and control aspects of the work environment (eg, individuals in "passive" jobs) (1,5).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Defined as an individual"s cognitive, affective and evaluative reactions towards their job (Greenberg & Baron, 1993), or put in simpler terms how negative or positive employees feel about their work (Spector & Fox, 2003). Job Satisfaction is among the most essential work-related attitudes managers, who believe that an organization has a responsibility to provide employees with jobs that are challenging and intrinsically rewarding, should seek to attain in their workplace (Robbins, 2001).…”
Section: Job Satisfactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Counter Productive work behaviour is measured through Counterproductive Work Behaviour tool as developed and used by Spector and Fox, (2003). 17 items are taken from the instrument developed by them (Spector and Fox, 2003).…”
Section: Counterproductive Work Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 items are taken from the instrument developed by them (Spector and Fox, 2003). ''All the responses are recorded on a five point likert scale'' ( 1= never, 2= very rarely, 3= sometimes,4= frequently,5= daily).…”
Section: Counterproductive Work Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%