2013
DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.23.2000146
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reducing surgical site infection in arthroplasty of the lower limb

Abstract: ObjectivesTo review the current best surgical practice and detail a multi-disciplinary approach that could further reduce joint replacement infection.MethodsReview of relevant literature indexed in PubMed.ResultsSurgical site infection is a major complication following arthroplasty. Despite its rarity in contemporary orthopaedic practice, it remains difficult to treat and is costly in terms of both patient morbidity and long-term health care resources.ConclusionsEmphasis on education of patients and all member… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
20
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
1
20
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Risk factors of orthopedic SSI could be modifiable or non-modifiable, patient or procedure related factors [3].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Risk factors of orthopedic SSI could be modifiable or non-modifiable, patient or procedure related factors [3].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We coordinated an expert panel of six orthopaedic oncology surgeons and three infectious disease specialists in preparation for this study. 8 , 12 , 24 Based on our survey data, expert opinion, and standard of care, we determined that the most appropriate antibiotic for this study was cefazolin. Our choice of five days as the long duration reflects consensus that an even longer duration would increase the risk for resistant organisms without providing further antimicrobial effectiveness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence of this, the relationship between downloads (marker of use by clinicians, researchers and policy makers) and citations (marker of use by researchers) will not necessarily be linear. In 2014, the five most cited BJR papers 4 - 8 from 2013 are listed in Table I and the five most downloaded BJR papers 8 - 12 are listed in Table II. Only one paper is in both Tables (Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%