2022
DOI: 10.1186/s13643-022-02045-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reducing systematic review burden using Deduklick: a novel, automated, reliable, and explainable deduplication algorithm to foster medical research

Abstract: Background Identifying and removing reference duplicates when conducting systematic reviews (SRs) remain a major, time-consuming issue for authors who manually check for duplicates using built-in features in citation managers. To address issues related to manual deduplication, we developed an automated, efficient, and rapid artificial intelligence-based algorithm named Deduklick. Deduklick combines natural language processing algorithms with a set of rules created by expert information speciali… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While deduplication can be conducted manually, nowadays standard bibliographic management software and specialized tools provide automated deduplication solutions, allowing for easier and faster processing. 35 42 43…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While deduplication can be conducted manually, nowadays standard bibliographic management software and specialized tools provide automated deduplication solutions, allowing for easier and faster processing. 35 42 43…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literature published in English was considered. Duplicate records were removed with Deduklick [ 17 ]. The search strategy is described in detail in Table S2 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We considered all publication dates while excluding animal studies. We removed duplicate records using Deduklicka fully automated de-duplication software (Borissov et al, 2022). Figure 1 (5) a study design with a control group or condition.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%