2022
DOI: 10.1002/acp.3969
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reducing teachers' unfounded beliefs through critical‐thinking education: A non‐randomized controlled trial

Abstract: The prevalence of unfounded beliefs (e.g., supernatural or conspiracy beliefs) remains an important issue due to their negative consequences in various domains. Interventions were shown to reduce supernatural beliefs only when addressing pseudoscientific ones. Based on these findings, we designed a single session intervention aiming to teach participants the epistemological distinction between science and pseudoscience. We then assessed the effectiveness of this intervention. Secondary school teachers (N = 130… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Existing interventions (e.g. prebunking, debunking, critical thinking training, and scientific literacy enhancement; (Caroti et al., 2022; Krekó, 2020; van der Linden et al., 2021)) have been shown to be efficient in reducing the endorsement of CBs. However, to the best of our knowledge, none of those interventions have been applied in a cancer care setting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing interventions (e.g. prebunking, debunking, critical thinking training, and scientific literacy enhancement; (Caroti et al., 2022; Krekó, 2020; van der Linden et al., 2021)) have been shown to be efficient in reducing the endorsement of CBs. However, to the best of our knowledge, none of those interventions have been applied in a cancer care setting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another limitation is the dearth of research examining the long-term effects of interventions (Bogart et al, 2021;Caroti & Arciszewski, 2022;Cookson et al, 2021), hindering the estimation of effect decline and utility of intervention repetition. Unfortunately, the intervention content and the content of the outcome measure were not matched in studies with intervention repetition, which likely underestimates the repetition potential and requires further examination.…”
Section: Research Gaps and Future Research Avenuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The follow-up measure was carried out one month after, during class time, as planned per students' normal school calendar. Besides questions related to gender, age and class type (8 th or 9 th grade), the questionnaire included the two following measures of UB adapted in French and validated in prior studies, and measures of behavioral intentions to check information and source, including in school settings (see Caroti et al, 2022; all descriptive statistics can be seen in Table 1).…”
Section: [Insert Table 2 Here]mentioning
confidence: 99%