2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246x.2009.04498.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reducing temperature uncertainties by stochastic geothermal reservoir modelling

Abstract: S U M M A R YQuantifying and minimizing uncertainty is vital for simulating technically and economically successful geothermal reservoirs. To this end, we apply a stochastic modelling sequence, a Monte Carlo study, based on (i) creating an ensemble of possible realizations of a reservoir model, (ii) forward simulation of fluid flow and heat transport, and (iii) constraining postprocessing using observed state variables. To generate the ensemble, we use the stochastic algorithm of Sequential Gaussian Simulation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Norden and Förster, 2006;Schütz et al, 2012a,b;Homuth et al, 2014). In that respect, our results are generally consistent with results from Vogt et al (2010) and Mottaghy et al (2011). They showed that considering the spatial distribution of TC (using a stochastic modelling approach with realizations of TC probability distributions) combined with a constraining post-processing procedure (calibration on temperatures) helps to significantly reduce temperature uncertainties (more than 50%) compared with the use of homogeneous layer values.…”
Section: Differences Compared With Previous Studiessupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Norden and Förster, 2006;Schütz et al, 2012a,b;Homuth et al, 2014). In that respect, our results are generally consistent with results from Vogt et al (2010) and Mottaghy et al (2011). They showed that considering the spatial distribution of TC (using a stochastic modelling approach with realizations of TC probability distributions) combined with a constraining post-processing procedure (calibration on temperatures) helps to significantly reduce temperature uncertainties (more than 50%) compared with the use of homogeneous layer values.…”
Section: Differences Compared With Previous Studiessupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Due to a mostly relatively short standstill period, the measured BHT values had to be corrected using the method of Leblanc et al (1982), Horner (1951), Lachenbruch & Brewer (1959) or Middleton (1982) dependent as well on additional information like number of temperature measurements, borehole diameter and duration of drilling fluid circulation (e.g. Hermanrud et al 1990;Vogt et al 2010).…”
Section: Geological Framework Of the Upper Rhine Grabenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such experiments will provide information on possible larger scale heat flow anisotropy caused by anisotropy and heterogeneity of thermal conductivity at a scale smaller than numerical grid scale size and larger than sample size which cannot be observed by measurements on small samples. Characteristic lengths of the thermal conductivity variations inside a larger scale reservoir can be determined from correlation lengths obtained from variogram analysis of spatial data (e.g., Deutsch and Journel [1998] and applied by Vogt et al [2010]). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%