Reducing the computational requirements for simulating tunnel fires by combining multiscale modelling and multiple processor calculation

Abstract

a b s t r a c tMultiscale modelling of tunnel fires that uses a coupled 3D (fire area) and 1D (the rest of the tunnel) model is seen as the solution to the numerical problem of the large domains associated with long tunnels. The present study demonstrates the feasibility of the implementation of this method in FDS version 6.0, a widely used fire-specific, open source CFD software. Furthermore, it compares the reduction in simulation time given by multiscale modelling with the one given by the use of multiple processor calculation. This was done using a 1200 m long tunnel with a rectangular cross-section as a demonstration case. The multiscale implementation consisted of placing a 30 MW fire in the centre of a 400 m long 3D domain, along with two 400 m long 1D ducts on each side of it, that were again bounded by two nodes each. A fixed volume flow was defined in the upstream duct and the two models were coupled directly. The feasibility analysis showed a difference of only 2% in temperature results from the published reference work that was performed with Ansys Fluent . The reduction in simulation time was significantly larger when using multiscale modelling than when performing multiple processor calculation (97% faster when using a single mesh and multiscale modelling; only 46% faster when using the full tunnel and multiple meshes). In summary, it was found that multiscale modelling with FDS v.6.0 is feasible, and the combination of multiple meshes and multiscale modelling was established as the most efficient method for reduction of the calculation times while still maintaining accurate results. Still, some unphysical flow oscillations were predicted by FDS v.6.0 and such results must be treated carefully.

Research@ZaB: Study of FDS Capabilities to Assess the High-Speed Train Impact on Pressure Pattern Within a Railway Tunnel

“…Reducing the grid cell size does not necessarily mean a significant increase in precision. However, it does considerably extend the simulation runtime [27]. So, a balance between the desired precision and the program execution time is preferable.…”

Smart Detection of Fire Source in Tunnel Based on the Numerical Database and Artificial Intelligence

“…FDS is an open-source CFD tool using the large eddy simulation turbulence model. This CFD code has gained extensive validation and verification and has been widely used to simulate tunnel fires for research and design [35,36]. Three parameters, i.e., the fire location, HRR, and outlet ventilation velocity, were considered.…”

The influence of vehicular obstacles on longitudinal ventilation control in tunnel fires

“…It is assumed that by not taking into account the heat losses, which are inherent to the tunnel geometry and the fire size, both the critical velocity and backlayering distance estimates lie within a conservative side since it represents the worst case in terms of buoyancy strength [38,39]. The buoyant jet simulates the flow rate and buoyancy when the fire plume has reached the tunnel height.…”