2014
DOI: 10.7883/yoken.67.27
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reducing the Delay in Initiation of Treatment Improved Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Imported Malaria

Abstract: SUMMARY:Although imported malaria poses a grave public health threat in Japan, diagnostic methods and disease management among patients and primary care providers has rarely been reported. Here, we retrospectively reviewed medical records of patients diagnosed with imported malaria in our hospital from 1991 to 2010. Thirty-four malaria cases were identified, corresponding to approximately 2z of the total number of cases in Japan. Falciparum malaria has become predominant in the last 2 decades, and compared wit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 31 publications
(39 reference statements)
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This means that much of the total diagnostic delay in the misdiagnosis group is primarily due to medical diagnostic delay. There are very few studies that speci cally assess medical diagnostic delay, with an mean published around 0.5-1.7 days [22,[27][28][29][30]. Even so, when all patients included in the study are analyzed together, patient delay is greater than medical diagnostic delay, con rming what was found in other studies and revealing the importance and consistency of such delay [22,31].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…This means that much of the total diagnostic delay in the misdiagnosis group is primarily due to medical diagnostic delay. There are very few studies that speci cally assess medical diagnostic delay, with an mean published around 0.5-1.7 days [22,[27][28][29][30]. Even so, when all patients included in the study are analyzed together, patient delay is greater than medical diagnostic delay, con rming what was found in other studies and revealing the importance and consistency of such delay [22,31].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%