Reducing the graphical user interface of a dynamic geometry system

Abstract

Graphical user interfaces (GUIs) of dynamic or interactive geometry software (DGS) allow users to interact with the DGS by using a computer mouse. Clicking on a GUI icon performs an action like choosing a construction tool or manipulating an object. For novices, it may be difficult to recognize and recall the icons needed for a task. Learning mathematics and learning the use of a dynamic geometry system at the same time could lead to cognitive overload. Several DGS systems try to solve this problem by offering different GUIs: expert users can choose between a wide range of icons, while for novice users only the most basic icons are presented. By preselecting a specific set of icons, a teacher can adapt a DGS to create a tool, which meets specific pedagogical demands. Two experiments were conducted to investigate the effects of reducing GUIs of a DGS. In experiment 1, which was carried out with full and reduced interfaces of the DGS Cinderella, the eye movements and gaze points of the users were recorded by an eye tracker. The time taken by users to find given icons in different types of interfaces was measured. In experiment 2, students measured the angle sums of polygons using the DGS Cinderella with a full or a reduced interface. No significant effects of GUI reduction were found in both experiments. The results are discussed and ideas for future research are presented.

Geometry Education, Including the Use of New Technologies: A Survey of Recent Research

“…Trends for digital geometry tools include (1) how geometry on the web is encountering various technological difficulties associated with the need to replace Java; (2) the issue of interface design and how users interact with onscreen geometry (Jackiw & Sinclair, 2009;Kortenkamp & Dohrmann, 2010;Laborde & Laborde, 2014;Mackrell 2011;Schimpf & Spannagel, 2011; (3) the rise of mobile devices and touch technology; and (4) new modes of interaction such as multi-touch and multi-collaboration.…”

Análise do impacto das Interface Gestuais em Softwares de Geometria Interativa no desempenho dos alunos

“…A TCC divide a carga cognitiva dentro de três diferentes tipos: intrínseca, persistente e estranha (Schimpf & Spannagel, 2011). A carga cognitiva intrínseca se refere a complexidade do conteúdo da aprendizagem.…”

Concepção de uma Família de Gestos para Construção de Objetos Geométricos e sua Utilização em um Sistema de Geometria Interativa para Dispositivos Móveis: GeoTouch

“…Além deste modelo não ser adequado para dispositivos móveis (que possuem telas do tipo multitoque e pequenas se comparadas aos desktops), diversos estudos apontam que interfaces de GI com muitos ícones podem gerar dúvidas, causar erros de interação e, por consequência, frustrar o aluno (principalmente o iniciante) durante o processo de aprendizagem [18] [37].…”