2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.06.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reducing the impact of measurement errors in FRF-based substructure decoupling using a modal model

Abstract: As the vibro-acoustic requirements of modern products become more stringent, the need for robust identification methods increases proportionally. Sometimes the identification of a component is greatly complicated by the presence of a supporting structure that cannot be removed during testing. This is where substructure decoupling finds its main applications. However, despite some recent advances in substructure decoupling, the number of successful applications has so far been limited. The main reason for this … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Structural dynamic responses of a built-up structure are highly dependent on the properties of structural components and joints [1]. The responses are often investigated and evaluated using FRFs due to overwhelming data [2][3][4]. FRFs can be obtained from the structure analytically and experimentally [5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Structural dynamic responses of a built-up structure are highly dependent on the properties of structural components and joints [1]. The responses are often investigated and evaluated using FRFs due to overwhelming data [2][3][4]. FRFs can be obtained from the structure analytically and experimentally [5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the rotational FRF (RFRF) could be indirectly obtained using an attachment of T-block [8,12]. The FRFs measured at the T-block was then decoupled from the system to obtain the rotational FRFof the test structure [4]. Another alternate method used to estimate RFRs is using X-block attachment with three translational accelerometers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The essential issue lies in the FBS method used in the preparation of experimental work as highlighted in [15]. The basic theory of the FBS method is that the FRF of all degrees of freedom (DOFs) at the interface connection is required for the coupling process [16] but measuring accurately all the translational and rotational FRFs at the interfaces of substructures is very challenging and problematic [17,18]. A few approaches have been proposed to improve the FBS method such as the transmission simulator method [19], the variability improvement of key inaccurate node groups (VIKING) [20], inverse dynamic substructuring [21] and modal expansion methods [22,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In structural dynamics, the dynamic behaviour of a structure which consists of several components or substructures can be efficiently and economically calculated by using dynamic substructuring method [1,2]. This method allows a built-up structure to be dissembled into several substructures and analysing analysis of the dynamic behaviour of the substructures can be done individually.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… (1),(2). and(3), the partitions matrix of subsystems A and B is derived to form the whole coupled system FRF matrix.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%