2019
DOI: 10.1002/celc.201801898
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reducing the Interfacial Resistance in All‐Solid‐State Lithium Batteries Based on Oxide Ceramic Electrolytes

Abstract: All‐solid‐state lithium batteries (ASSLBs) are regarded as next‐generation advanced energy‐storage devices, owing to their high energy density and safety. The interfacial resistance is a crucial factor affecting the practical application of ASSLBs. ASSLBs based on oxide‐based ceramic electrolytes (OCEs) still exhibit poor electrochemical performance, owing to the large interfacial resistance. Area‐specific resistance values at the interfaces ranging from thousands of ohms to several ohms per square centimeter … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
(216 reference statements)
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Li 7 La 3 Zr 2 O 12 (LLZO), Li 0.34 La 0.56 TiO 3 (LLTO), Li 1.5 Al 0.5 Ge 1.5 (PO 4 ) 3 (LAGP), and Li 1.4 Al 0.4 Ti 1.6 (PO 4 ) 3 (LATP) are outstanding oxide electrolytes in solid‐state electrolytes due to their excellent thermostability, wide electrochemical stable windows, superior Li‐ionic conductivity, high elastic modulus, low cost, and environmental friendliness . In recent years, these oxide electrolytes have exhibited an improved performance with the decrease of interfacial resistance in ASSLBs . The ASSLBs based on oxide electrolytes have already exhibited a comparable discharge capacity with traditional Li‐ion battery .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li 7 La 3 Zr 2 O 12 (LLZO), Li 0.34 La 0.56 TiO 3 (LLTO), Li 1.5 Al 0.5 Ge 1.5 (PO 4 ) 3 (LAGP), and Li 1.4 Al 0.4 Ti 1.6 (PO 4 ) 3 (LATP) are outstanding oxide electrolytes in solid‐state electrolytes due to their excellent thermostability, wide electrochemical stable windows, superior Li‐ionic conductivity, high elastic modulus, low cost, and environmental friendliness . In recent years, these oxide electrolytes have exhibited an improved performance with the decrease of interfacial resistance in ASSLBs . The ASSLBs based on oxide electrolytes have already exhibited a comparable discharge capacity with traditional Li‐ion battery .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 31–33 ] Concerning processing of different SES materials, challenges arise indicating the complexity of the production system. Although the thermal and chemical properties of oxides are of great advantage for the application in ASSBs, [ 34 ] drawbacks are evident due to their high interfacial [ 35 ] and grain boundary resistances, [ 36 ] which reduce the ionic conductivities. [ 37 ] Therefore, a complex sintering step at high temperatures (Li 7 La 3 Zr 2 O 12 (LLZ) ≈1100 °C; Li 1+ x Al x Ti 2− x (PO 4 ) 3 (LATP) and Li 1+ x AL x Ge 2− x (PO 4 ) 3 (LAGP) ≈800 °C.…”
Section: Fundamentalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[31][32][33] Concerning processing of different SES materials, challenges arise indicating the complexity of the production system. Although the thermal and chemical properties of oxides are of great advantage for the application in ASSBs, [34] drawbacks are evident due to their high interfacial [35] and grain boundary resistances, [36] which reduce the ionic conductivities. [37] Therefore, a complex sintering step at high temperatures (Li 7 La 3 Zr 2 O 12 (LLZ) %1100 C; Li 1þx Al x Ti 2Àx (PO 4 ) 3 (LATP) and Li 1þx AL x Ge 2Àx (PO 4 ) 3 (LAGP) %800 C. [38] A reduced sintering temperature for LLZ can be achieved by adding additives, e.g., Al 2 O 3 [39] ), which implicates difficulties and high costs in scaling up, is required to densify the oxide layers and increase ion conductivity.…”
Section: Solid Electrolyte Separator Materials and Production Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Adopting a buffer layer between Li metal anode and SSEs is deemed to be an effective strategy to solve the aforementioned problems. [25,26] Until now, much effort has been dedicated to designing various buffer layers, such as 3D polymer-gel layers, [27] poly(oxyethylene) (PEO) buffer layer, [16] Al 2 O 3 nanolayer, [28,29] and germanium (Ge) thin film. [14] Nevertheless, due to the poor elastic feature of solid inorganic buffer layers, the formed interface at the buffer layers and the LAGP SSEs can be severely damaged by the volume change of the anode during the repeated Li plating/stripping processes, leading to a rapidly increased interfacial resistance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%