2011
DOI: 10.1109/tap.2011.2158943
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reducing the Number of Elements in Linear and Planar Antenna Arrays With Sparseness Constrained Optimization

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
61
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the use of a not redundant number of elements is generally advantageous, since it allows to reduce the feeding network complexity and the antenna weight. For this reason, in the last years, several efforts have been made to propose techniques for the design of arrays, linear and planar, with a reduced number of elements not equally spaced [23][24][25][26]. Due to their probabilistic nature, BOA and M-BOA seem particularly suitable to determine, during the optimization process, also the proper number of array elements, and therefore the design of such kind of array seems a particularly suitable test case for comparing their performances.…”
Section: M-boa Based Linear Array Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, the use of a not redundant number of elements is generally advantageous, since it allows to reduce the feeding network complexity and the antenna weight. For this reason, in the last years, several efforts have been made to propose techniques for the design of arrays, linear and planar, with a reduced number of elements not equally spaced [23][24][25][26]. Due to their probabilistic nature, BOA and M-BOA seem particularly suitable to determine, during the optimization process, also the proper number of array elements, and therefore the design of such kind of array seems a particularly suitable test case for comparing their performances.…”
Section: M-boa Based Linear Array Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All these optimization approaches generally allow to obtain optimum solution using as free parameters the position and/or the excitation of the array elements, while their number is fixed "a priori". Recently, some published papers [23][24][25][26] proved the possibility to fulfill the design constraints while reducing the number of elements in non-uniformly spaced arrays. In [23,24] the number of elements in the array is achieved by the singular value decomposition (SDV) approach, while the proper excitation and location of the elements is obtained with the matrix pencil method (MPM); in [25] sparseness constrained optimization is adopted, and finally in [26] the "probability" of different values of the number of array elements is provided, by sampling the distribution using Bayesian Interference (BI); this method, however, has to take into account the information provided by thousands of samples in order to get the proper probability distribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This work focuses on the synthesis of reconfigurable multiple patterns with fewer elements by selecting the common ones with optimized excitation amplitudes and phases. Some synthesis methods by using nonuniform element positions [16][17][18][19][20][21][22], or by applying thinning techniques [23][24][25], have been presented to effectively reduce the number of elements. However, these reviewed techniques are proposed for the synthesis of single-pattern arrays.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, new techniques such as matrix pencil methods [12]- [14], constrained optimization methods [15]- [17], compressive sensing methods [18]- [21], and analytical methods [22]- [23] have been successfully applied in designing arrays with a reduced number of elements. The matrix pencil methods yield arrays that have elements in arbitrary positions and are useful when the elements are not constrained to predefined positions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%