2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.12.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reducing the risk of house loss due to wildfires

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
1
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These may include mechanical fuel management, ignition management, initial attack and community engagement. Mechanical removal or thinning can reduce fuel loads and alter fuel structure adjacent to property or within koala habitat to manage exposure from fire due to local high fuel loads (Penman et al 2015a). In a simulation study Cary et al (2009) found ignition management to have a significant influence on wildfire extent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These may include mechanical fuel management, ignition management, initial attack and community engagement. Mechanical removal or thinning can reduce fuel loads and alter fuel structure adjacent to property or within koala habitat to manage exposure from fire due to local high fuel loads (Penman et al 2015a). In a simulation study Cary et al (2009) found ignition management to have a significant influence on wildfire extent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Primarily the focus has been to use planned burning to reduce the risk from fire to human life and property situated within or adjacent to native vegetation (Fernandes and Botelho 2003;Penman et al 2011). However, additional strategies are often adopted by agencies to protect life and property such as mechanical fuel treatments (Syphard et al 2011;Syphard et al 2012;North et al 2015), community engagement (Eriksen and Prior 2013;Penman et al 2015a) and fire suppression (Calkin et al 2005;Plucinski et al 2012;Penman et al 2013b;Penman et al 2014). Several studies in Australia have found that while planned burning may reduce the extent of wildfire, the net effect is an increase in overall fire extent and frequency (Boer et al 2009;King et al 2013;Price 2015) leading to the emergence of new landscape fire regimes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, fire effects and respective burning probabilities were considered to estimate the expected net value change [36]. Expected net value change is a risk-neutral measure in terms of gain or loss expressed on a percentage basis, and allows quantitative wildfire risk assessment for multiple valued resources and human assets [33]. In order to consider the variations between economic values of different houses and quantify economic losses at the individual structure level, we used the latest cadaster reference of economic values (V).…”
Section: Risk Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each year, several hundred thousand fires burn throughout the world and destroy forest resources, shrubs and peat-bogs over a surface area of several million hectares [8][9][10][11]. Previously many countries e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously many countries e.g. Australia, USA and Canada, Russia, Brazil, European countries endured catastrophic fires and their rescue services encountered the difficult task of controlling a natural element that required the involvement of many rescue forces and a large amount of fire extinguishing equipment [8,[10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%