2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-263x.2010.00111.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reducing threats to species: threat reversibility and links to industry

Abstract: Threats to species' persistence are typically mitigated via lengthy and costly recovery planning processes that are implemented only after species are at risk of extinction. To reduce overall threats and minimize risks to species not yet imperiled, a proactive and broad-scale framework is needed. Using data on threats to imperiled species in Canada to illustrate our approach, we link threats to industries causing the harm, thus providing regulators with quantitative data that can be used directly in cost-benef… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The annual production of hundreds of thousands, often millions, of eggs per female provided the basis for Thomas Huxley's prediction in 1883 that ''all the great sea-fisheries are inexhaustible'' (Smith 1994). Indeed, the hypothesis that high fecundity confers low extinction risk and high recovery potential is one of several empirically suspect assertions that have contributed to the perception that the threat of extinction for marine fishes is lower than that of other vertebrates (Musick (Patrick et al 2010, Prugh et al 2010.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The annual production of hundreds of thousands, often millions, of eggs per female provided the basis for Thomas Huxley's prediction in 1883 that ''all the great sea-fisheries are inexhaustible'' (Smith 1994). Indeed, the hypothesis that high fecundity confers low extinction risk and high recovery potential is one of several empirically suspect assertions that have contributed to the perception that the threat of extinction for marine fishes is lower than that of other vertebrates (Musick (Patrick et al 2010, Prugh et al 2010.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While threat and habitat maps suggest sites where management can mitigate the greatest amount of threat or protect the most habitat, they may be inadequate for identifying the most cost-effective actions [56]. Not all threats are equally manageable, nor is the cost of actions to mitigate threats equal [47]. Fundamental knowledge obtained from threat mapping studies needs to be combined with estimated habitat loss rates caused by threats, and costs of conservation actions, to cost-efficiently minimize losses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Blue lettering denotes parts of the process evaluated in this study. Symbols denote parts of the process evaluated for marine fishes in previous studies (as detailed in Table S1 1 ): ❖ = Hutchings and Festa-Bianchet 2009, Powles 2011, Waples et al 2013; ‫ء‬ = Mooers et al 2010;= Favaro et al 2014;= Prugh et al 2010; ૽ = Mooers et al 2007, Findlay et al 2009, Dawe and Neis 2012, Schultz et al 2013✓ = Vanderzwaag and Hutchings 2005;+ = McCune et al 2013, Taylor andPinkus 2013; = Office of the Auditor General Canada 2013.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%